Nikos wrote:
> Given that the NC lsat data set represents untouched DN's,
does it?
> perhaps it has to do with "old vs new" calibration parameters?
at least for the lsat7_2000 NC maps, the cloud detection is also
very bad, and there I confirmed the calibration numbers with the
values listed in the r.info metadata.
I think we'll have to redownload the three NC scenes from GloVis
to know for sure.
Hamish
_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
