On Friday 17 of September 2010 22:27:40 Hamish wrote: > Nikos wrote: > > Given that the NC lsat data set represents untouched DN's, > > does it?
We'll nail that one... ;-) > > perhaps it has to do with "old vs new" calibration parameters? > > at least for the lsat7_2000 NC maps, the cloud detection is also > very bad, and there I confirmed the calibration numbers with the > values listed in the r.info metadata. ok, then I did not read carefully the previous posts. I was thinking that acca on the 2007 ETM+ scene was more or less good. > I think we'll have to redownload the three NC scenes from GloVis > to know for sure. Downloaded: - LT50160351987287XXX08 - extra: LT50160351988258XXX03 (includes visible clouds - maybe good for testing?) Ordered via Glovis: - LE70160352002144EDC00 (Acquisition Date: 2002/05/24) - LE70160352000091EDC00 (Acquisition Date: 2000/03/31) _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
