Stephen Sefick:

> > I saw a paper on this list the other day, but have deleted the original
> > email.  Is this the appropriate thing to cite when referring to GRASS
> GIS in
> > a paper?
>
>
Markus Neteler:


> You may cite as this:
>
> (from http://grass.osgeo.org/download/index.php)
>
> *  GRASS Development Team, 2010. Geographic Resources Analysis Support
> System (GRASS) Software, Version 6.4. Open Source Geospatial
> Foundation. http://grass.osgeo.org
> *  GRASS Development Team, 2010. Geographic Resources Analysis Support
> System (GRASS) Programmer's Manual. Open Source Geospatial Foundation.
> Electronic document: http://grass.osgeo.org/programming6/
>
>
In three days time I will be submitting a paper to Geomorphology where the
main research was made entirely with GRASS.

I was willing to ask you: right now when I mention I used GRASS I refer to
it like

"... GRASS GIS (© 1999-2010 GRASS Development Team) version is 6.4.0svn and
the main modules that compose ...."


and then when I talk about a specific module I say like

"....the minimum-watershed-size threshold was set to 100 cells (GRASS GIS
6.4.0svn Reference Manual, 2010)..."


Is it correct? If so, should I use the same two aforementioned references
at the reference list, but replacing "Programmer's Manual" by "Reference
Manual"?

Thanks for the help. I really want to do it right.

Best,

Marcello.
_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user

Reply via email to