A few minutes after your message, Markus Mets sent another message in disagreement with this.
Any other inputs? On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:49:10 +0200, Micha Silver wrote: On 03/28/2012 02:06 PM, [email protected] [1] wrote: Greetings Daniel lee suggested me that the problem might be the defined region. But, as far as I know, Defined region has no impact over importing data. This is true right? AFAIK, not quite true. Vector data are imported "whole" with no regard to the region. But raster imports honour the current region. So only that part of the imported raster covered by the current region is imported. Furthermore the module r.in.gdal has a flag '-e' to reset the current region to the extents of the imported data, and thus importing the whole dataset. Thanks Antonio Am 27. März 2012 11:52 schrieb António Rocha : Greetings I have imported a Raster image in GRASS 6.4.1 with r.in.gdal and now, when I import the same raster (with 6.4.2) there is a grid mistmatch (more or less a quarter pixel) from previous import to the current import. The image is the same, the Location/Mapset also the only difference is the update of GRASS. Is this expected? Thanks Antonio This mail was received via Mail-SeCure System. _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] [3] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user [4] This mail was received via Mail-SeCure System. Links: ------ [1] mailto:[email protected] [2] mailto:[email protected] [3] mailto:[email protected] [4] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
