On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:02 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Markus > So, if the same image imported in different GRASS versions to the same > Location/Mapset, but it has a displacement of half pixel, it means that it > was a problem in earlier version of GRASS?
So far, you have mentioned only a grid mismatch between the two imported versions. Comparing r.info of these to gdalinfo of the original raster will tell you which version is correct. Markus M > > On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:49:42 +0200, Markus Metz > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:06 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Greetings >>> >>> >>> >>> Daniel lee suggested me that the problem might be the defined region. >>> But, >>> as far as I know, Defined region has no impact over importing data. This >>> is >>> true right? >> >> >> Yes, r.in.gdal ignores the current region. The extents and resolution >> as reported by gdalinfo for the original raster and r.info for the >> imported raster must be identical. >> >> Markus M >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Antonio >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 27. März 2012 11:52 schrieb António >>> Rocha <[email protected]>: >>> >>> >>>> Greetings >>>> I have imported a Raster image in GRASS 6.4.1 with r.in.gdal and now, >>>> when >>>> I import the same raster (with 6.4.2) there is a grid mistmatch (more or >>>> less a quarter pixel) from previous import to the current import. The >>>> image >>>> is the same, the Location/Mapset also the only difference is the update >>>> of >>>> GRASS. Is this expected? >>>> Thanks >>>> Antonio >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> grass-user mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user >>> > _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
