On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Moritz Lennert < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 07/12/12 17:16, Markus Metz wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Aren Cambre<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> OK, I think I get it now. After you've hit 4 SDs (or even arguably 3 >>> SDs!) >>> the contribution of more points to that square fades to almost nothing >>> without extreme clusters of points. >>> >> >> Right. >> >>> >>> Seems like this ought to be clarified in the UI and documentation? >>> Should I >>> file an enhancement request? >>> >> >> I would rather have the option 'stddeviation' renamed to 'radius', >> kernel radius in map units, which it actually is currently for all >> kernels but gaussian, and internally adjust standard deviation instead >> of radius for the gaussian kernel. I guess that the kernel radius is >> of more importance to users than the standard deviation. Makes sense? >> > > > +1 > > Moritz > Leave a comment at http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/1828 to help the case. Aren
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
