+1 for me too. Otherwise very confusing. Michael ____________________ C. Michael Barton Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change Arizona State University
voice: 480-965-6262 (SHESC), 480-727-9746 (CSDC) fax: 480-965-7671 (SHESC), 480-727-0709 (CSDC) www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton, http://csdc.asu.edu On Dec 10, 2012, at 1:19 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Moritz Lennert <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [GRASS-user] Does v.kernel have to take 16+ hours? > Date: December 10, 2012 1:03:46 AM MST > To: Markus Metz <[email protected]> > Cc: <[email protected]> > > > On 07/12/12 17:16, Markus Metz wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Aren Cambre<[email protected]> wrote: >>> OK, I think I get it now. After you've hit 4 SDs (or even arguably 3 SDs!) >>> the contribution of more points to that square fades to almost nothing >>> without extreme clusters of points. >> >> Right. >>> >>> Seems like this ought to be clarified in the UI and documentation? Should I >>> file an enhancement request? >> >> I would rather have the option 'stddeviation' renamed to 'radius', >> kernel radius in map units, which it actually is currently for all >> kernels but gaussian, and internally adjust standard deviation instead >> of radius for the gaussian kernel. I guess that the kernel radius is >> of more importance to users than the standard deviation. Makes sense? > > > +1 > > Moritz >
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
