Done in r54271.
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Michael Barton <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for me too. Otherwise very confusing. > > Michael > ____________________ > C. Michael Barton > Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity > Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change > Arizona State University > > voice: 480-965-6262 (SHESC), 480-727-9746 (CSDC) > fax: 480-965-7671 (SHESC), 480-727-0709 (CSDC) > www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton, http://csdc.asu.edu > > > > On Dec 10, 2012, at 1:19 AM, <[email protected]> > wrote: > > From: Moritz Lennert <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [GRASS-user] Does v.kernel have to take 16+ hours? > Date: December 10, 2012 1:03:46 AM MST > To: Markus Metz <[email protected]> > Cc: <[email protected]> > > > On 07/12/12 17:16, Markus Metz wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Aren Cambre<[email protected]> wrote: > > OK, I think I get it now. After you've hit 4 SDs (or even arguably 3 SDs!) > the contribution of more points to that square fades to almost nothing > without extreme clusters of points. > > > Right. > > > Seems like this ought to be clarified in the UI and documentation? Should I > file an enhancement request? > > > I would rather have the option 'stddeviation' renamed to 'radius', > kernel radius in map units, which it actually is currently for all > kernels but gaussian, and internally adjust standard deviation instead > of radius for the gaussian kernel. I guess that the kernel radius is > of more importance to users than the standard deviation. Makes sense? > > > > +1 > > Moritz > > > > _______________________________________________ > grass-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user > _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
