On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Markus Metz wrote:
No, they should not. They cover a part of that rectangle. You need to patch coverages from different years together in order to get a more complete coverage.
Markus, Ah, I didn't realize this. That explains the why there are three files with different names for three years.
The -o flag of r.in.gdal overrides the source's projection for the map instead of using it.
Mea culpa! I had that backwards. Thanks very much, Rich _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
