On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 7:57 AM, Nikos Alexandris <n...@nikosalexandris.net> wrote: > > * Helmut Kudrnovsky <hel...@web.de> [2018-07-14 04:19:53 -0700]: > >> >>> I did that before too. Did you also note that it takes "too much" >time to >>> create the Location using the '.tif' file? >> >> >> it didn't take a long time to create the location. > > > For completion, using the same sample I used first in this thread: > > ``` > time grass -c int_43120C4404.tif /geo/grassdb/onsight/nad83_cors96_utm_z10/ > .. > real 0m25.083s > user 0m0.184s > sys 0m21.699s > `` > which is unusually long.
Something must be wrong with disk IO. Here, it takes 0.09s > > Seeing the other branch of this thread, about using the .tif file: in > this case, there is something in the image's geo-metadata that does not > play nice to create a new Location. Thus, it's best to use one of the > Shapefiles. Not a good idea because the shapefiles and the tifs do not always have the same SRS. Please use the same datasource to be imported directly to create a new location. Markus M > > Nikos > > [rest deleted] > > _______________________________________________ > grass-user mailing list > grass-user@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user