Hello Vero, Actually, 3b has a complete rectangle (NW in red, SE in blue).
Regards, Huidae On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 7:24 PM Veronica Andreo <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > +1 for showing computational region by default! It is a super handy > feature :) > > Regarding the different colors, I do not have a very strong opinion. I was > already used to blue for full region extent coincident with display and red > when display is different from region extent. > Case 3b proposed, IIUC, would mean that display will have incomplete lines > and that seems more confusing in my view. I would suggest that (if > implemented like this) 3b is shown as 3a. > > my2cents > Vero > > El lun., 24 dic. 2018 a las 15:30, Huidae Cho (<[email protected]>) > escribió: > >> Maybe, this figure is easier to understand. blue for comp region and red >> for partial version. >> >> Black: display >> Blue: full comp region >> Red: partial intersection of display and full comp region >> >> In this color scheme, it's very clear what we're looking at in the >> display. >> >> [image: image.png] >> >> Huidae >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 9:06 AM Huidae Cho <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> So how does it work now in one color? >>> >>> 1. display == full comp region: red box >>> 2. display > and contains full comp region: red box smaller than display >>> 3. display < and inside full comp region: no box at all? (can be >>> confusing with cases 4 & 5) or red box (can be confusing with case 1). I >>> think we need two colors in this case? Actual comp region borders red, >>> Display borders within comp region blue (maybe, switching blue and red >>> would be better?). For example, completely inside (not crossing any comp >>> region boundaries) blue box. Looking at the east comp region boundary: >>> vertical line in red, top-left, bottom-left, and left in blue. Again, I >>> think if we use red and blue, it would be better to use blue for comp >>> region borders and red for partially/contained borders. >>> 4. display > and does not contain full comp region: no box >>> 5. display < and outside full comp region: no box >>> >>> Huidae >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 7:02 AM Martin Landa <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> st 26. 9. 2018 v 20:27 odesílatel Anna Petrášová <[email protected]> >>>> napsal: >>>> > I think it changes color depending if you are zoomed inside or >>>> outside of the region. I find this behavior little bit confusing, perhaps >>>> just having one color would be enough, and maybe don't show it when you are >>>> zoomed inside? >>>> >>>> in r73826 the settings was changed to show comp. region extent in red >>>> color only regardless display and computation extent position. If no >>>> objection I will do backport to g76 release branch in next days. >>>> Question is whether comp. region extent should be displayed by >>>> default. The behaviour has been changed accordingly [1], but >>>> unfortunately there was no feedback. Any opinion (since it affects >>>> 7.6.0 release)? >>>> >>>> Ma >>>> >>>> [1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3519 >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Martin Landa >>>> http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa >>>> http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Huidae Cho, Ph.D., GISP, PE (MD), CFM, M.ASCE >>> Open Source GIS Developer, GRASS GIS Development Team >>> >> >> >> -- >> Huidae Cho, Ph.D., GISP, PE (MD), CFM, M.ASCE >> Open Source GIS Developer, GRASS GIS Development Team >> _______________________________________________ >> grass-user mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user > > -- Huidae Cho, Ph.D., GISP, PE (MD), CFM, M.ASCE Open Source GIS Developer, GRASS GIS Development Team
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
