Hi Huidae, El jue., 27 dic. 2018 22:17, Huidae Cho <gras...@gmail.com> escribió:
> Hello Vero, > > Actually, 3b has a complete rectangle (NW in red, SE in blue) > Right :) I overlooked the blue part. Still, IMHO, case 3b it's confusing. Best, Vero On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 7:24 PM Veronica Andreo <veroand...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> +1 for showing computational region by default! It is a super handy >> feature :) >> >> Regarding the different colors, I do not have a very strong opinion. I >> was already used to blue for full region extent coincident with display and >> red when display is different from region extent. >> Case 3b proposed, IIUC, would mean that display will have incomplete >> lines and that seems more confusing in my view. I would suggest that (if >> implemented like this) 3b is shown as 3a. >> >> my2cents >> Vero >> >> El lun., 24 dic. 2018 a las 15:30, Huidae Cho (<gras...@gmail.com>) >> escribió: >> >>> Maybe, this figure is easier to understand. blue for comp region and red >>> for partial version. >>> >>> Black: display >>> Blue: full comp region >>> Red: partial intersection of display and full comp region >>> >>> In this color scheme, it's very clear what we're looking at in the >>> display. >>> >>> [image: image.png] >>> >>> Huidae >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 9:06 AM Huidae Cho <gras...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> So how does it work now in one color? >>>> >>>> 1. display == full comp region: red box >>>> 2. display > and contains full comp region: red box smaller than display >>>> 3. display < and inside full comp region: no box at all? (can be >>>> confusing with cases 4 & 5) or red box (can be confusing with case 1). I >>>> think we need two colors in this case? Actual comp region borders red, >>>> Display borders within comp region blue (maybe, switching blue and red >>>> would be better?). For example, completely inside (not crossing any comp >>>> region boundaries) blue box. Looking at the east comp region boundary: >>>> vertical line in red, top-left, bottom-left, and left in blue. Again, I >>>> think if we use red and blue, it would be better to use blue for comp >>>> region borders and red for partially/contained borders. >>>> 4. display > and does not contain full comp region: no box >>>> 5. display < and outside full comp region: no box >>>> >>>> Huidae >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 7:02 AM Martin Landa <landa.mar...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> st 26. 9. 2018 v 20:27 odesílatel Anna Petrášová < >>>>> kratocha...@gmail.com> napsal: >>>>> > I think it changes color depending if you are zoomed inside or >>>>> outside of the region. I find this behavior little bit confusing, perhaps >>>>> just having one color would be enough, and maybe don't show it when you >>>>> are >>>>> zoomed inside? >>>>> >>>>> in r73826 the settings was changed to show comp. region extent in red >>>>> color only regardless display and computation extent position. If no >>>>> objection I will do backport to g76 release branch in next days. >>>>> Question is whether comp. region extent should be displayed by >>>>> default. The behaviour has been changed accordingly [1], but >>>>> unfortunately there was no feedback. Any opinion (since it affects >>>>> 7.6.0 release)? >>>>> >>>>> Ma >>>>> >>>>> [1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3519 >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Martin Landa >>>>> http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa >>>>> http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Huidae Cho, Ph.D., GISP, PE (MD), CFM, M.ASCE >>>> Open Source GIS Developer, GRASS GIS Development Team >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Huidae Cho, Ph.D., GISP, PE (MD), CFM, M.ASCE >>> Open Source GIS Developer, GRASS GIS Development Team >>> _______________________________________________ >>> grass-user mailing list >>> grass-user@lists.osgeo.org >>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user >> >> > > -- > Huidae Cho, Ph.D., GISP, PE (MD), CFM, M.ASCE > Open Source GIS Developer, GRASS GIS Development Team >
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user