Hi Tom, I suspect the problem is in the delimiter, try to replace all the spaces in the potential CSV file with commas. The default delimiter was changed between FUTURES versions, so perhaps that might be the problem.
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 11:57 AM Tom Hackbarth <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Grass-Users, > > I have a problem initiating the r.futures.calib module within the FUTURES > model. > > Running the following code, I always get the same error message: > > *r.futures.calib --overwrite development_start=urban_2020@IKNmapset > development_end=urban24CA3@IKNmapset repeat=5 compactness_mean=0.2 > compactness_range=0.05 discount_factor=0.2 patch_threshold=200 > patch_sizes=C:\Users\Student\Documents\TOM GIS\grass new\patcheshard.txt > calibration_results=C:\Users\Student\Documents\TOM GIS\grass > new\calibhard.csv nprocs=1 development_pressure=devpres_2020@IKNmapset > incentive_power=0.2 > predictors=dist_Protec_km@IKNmapset,dist_to_urbancore_km@IKNmapset,dist_waterbodies_km@IKNmapset,Forest_smooth_perc_new@IKNmapset,roads_c_dens_perc@IKNmapset > n_dev_neighbourhood=10 devpot_params=C:\Users\Student\Documents\TOM > GIS\grass new\grassdata > IKN\grassdata\newLocation\IKNmapset\.tmp/unknown\2080.0 num_neighbors=4 > seed_search=probability development_pressure_approach=gravity gamma=0.2 > scaling_factor=0.1 num_steps=3 subregions=Subregions_IKN@IKNmapset > demand=C:\Users\Student\Documents\TOM GIS\grass new\grassdata > IKN\Population data\Results rdemand\Demand_DG_lin* > > The error message is: > > *Analyzing original patches...* > *Running calibration combination 1/1 of simulation attempt 1/5 with random > seed 10000...* > *ERROR: Potential: wrong number of columns: ID Intercept devpressure_24_3 > dist_protec_km dist_to_urbancore_km dist_waterbodies_km > forest_smooth_perc_new roads_c_dens_perc* > *WARNING: No data base element files found* > *ERROR: Running r.futures.pga failed. Details: Module run None > r.futures.pga* > > Any idea what the problem might be? The potential input table seems fine > to me (see picture below). I do not know what it could mean that the > number of columns is wrong, as I am not aware of any specifications or > given requirements in the potential file for *r.futures.calib*. > > [image: image.png] > Thanks in advance. I am happy for any help! > > Best regards > > Tom >
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
