Thank you.
On Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 4:08:49 AM UTC-5, Jochen Schalanda wrote: > > Hi Samuel, > > Graylog currently only supports flat message structures, i. e. not nested > objects and no lists. > > This being said, there's a JSON extractor which can map JSON structures > into flat message fields, see > http://docs.graylog.org/en/1.3/pages/extractors.html#using-the-json-extractor > for details. > > > Has this been an issue for people in real-world use? > > > At least for the Graylog users I know, this hasn't been an issue in the > real-world. I'm sure it's nice to have, but it also increases complexity > while processing and when writing queries, so I'm not sure that it's > actually worth implementing this feature. > > > Cheers, > Jochen > > On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 18:24:40 UTC+1, Samuel Neff wrote: >> >> Any updates on this four year old request? i'm setting up logging for a >> new app and really like Graylog but am getting pushback because of this one >> issue. Unfortunately this seems to be an unusual restriction--most other >> loggers support complex JSON logging. >> >> Other than this issue. Graylog looks great. How are others working around >> it? Has this been an issue for people in real-world use? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Sam >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Graylog Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/graylog2/9aa3f2b0-7602-43ca-9387-db8e7f2bce94%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
