Hi Jochen,
We are looking for something that parses our nested json logs. I tested
graylog but it fails at parsing nested arrays. Not even flattening
structures helps. Any suggestions?
For example:
abc[[{t=value1, v=154.99}, {t=value2, v=0.0}]]
flatten structures=enable or disabled in json extractor, it remains the
same.
Thanks
Tushar
On Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 1:08:49 AM UTC-8, Jochen Schalanda wrote:
>
> Hi Samuel,
>
> Graylog currently only supports flat message structures, i. e. not nested
> objects and no lists.
>
> This being said, there's a JSON extractor which can map JSON structures
> into flat message fields, see
> http://docs.graylog.org/en/1.3/pages/extractors.html#using-the-json-extractor
> for details.
>
>
> Has this been an issue for people in real-world use?
>
>
> At least for the Graylog users I know, this hasn't been an issue in the
> real-world. I'm sure it's nice to have, but it also increases complexity
> while processing and when writing queries, so I'm not sure that it's
> actually worth implementing this feature.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Jochen
>
> On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 18:24:40 UTC+1, Samuel Neff wrote:
>>
>> Any updates on this four year old request? i'm setting up logging for a
>> new app and really like Graylog but am getting pushback because of this one
>> issue. Unfortunately this seems to be an unusual restriction--most other
>> loggers support complex JSON logging.
>>
>> Other than this issue. Graylog looks great. How are others working around
>> it? Has this been an issue for people in real-world use?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Sam
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Graylog Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/graylog2/ab65fb19-888b-41d2-ad10-060aaa0f775b%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.