Ok. Thanks a lot for the support! On Apr 9, 6:30 pm, Erik Vold <[email protected]> wrote: > On Apr 9, 1:47 pm, Zé Cláudio <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I just want to be sure whether this is a undesired collateral effect > > or an intentional modification. > > It was a intentional modification, if it wasn't made then site owners > can block user scripts from running on their site (issue 1082). > > >In other words: should I expect you to rollback this modification or get > >used to this behavior? > > I'm guessing, but I doubt it'll be rolled back at this point. The only > other option is to create a meta data @key to signal that the user > script should useCapture, which all user scripts would need to do in > order to prevent the site from potentially blocking their script. > > Erik
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "greasemonkey-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-users?hl=en.
