On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Erik Vold <[email protected]> wrote: >[...] > On 2011-01-22, at 15:44, esquifit <[email protected]> wrote: >>[...] >> 2) If after the upgrade to 0.9 I make a minor edit in a script and >> save it, will the @includes in config.xml replace those in the script? > > no, the @includes in the script replace the ones stored in config.xml
Well, I suppose this means that I'll have to go through the nearly 200 scripts I have installed and check one by one whether there is a metadata mismatch between the script and config.xml, and manually update the affected scripts to reflect the reality before attempting the upgrade to 0.9. Otherwise I could potentially have massive problems. If my understanding is correct, this is certainly something it should be informed about in the GM blog at the minimum, and also at UMO. PS: I change metadata of 3rd part scripts very often because they tend to be too permissive, for example "http:*.youtube.*/*", which to the effects of security amounts to the same as "http:*". My own scripts also change continuously, since they are under permanent optimization. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "greasemonkey-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-users?hl=en.
