On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Anthony Lieuallen <[email protected]> wrote:
> I applaud your effort (not to mention knowledge of the potential pitfalls), > but situations like these were judged to be the severe minority, while the > changes made were instead judged to be an improvement for everyone. > > Long story short: it's impossible to please everyone all of the time. We do > our best to please as many people as we can as much of the time as possible, > but everything in the real world is a compromise. Sure, I'm not complaining nor even requesting any feature. I was just trying to understand what I should consider before upgrading to 0.9. Yet I think that the fact that after the upgrade to 0.9 every subsequent edit would overwrite config.xml with the actual headers in the script is, IMHO, something it should be informed about. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "greasemonkey-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-users?hl=en.
