Ranjit Ranjit wrote: > it is quite obvious that u haven't used/writen such terms. even i never > said so. > why... is der any rule in the forum that only SOME words should be used > while replying?
Your Question was why don't u let those "innocent" souls to escape from "disturbing questions" of caste and gender... With my limited understanding what i got from the above sentence is , i portrayed some people as innocent (quotes). and i complained about "disturbing questions" on cast and gender to them. Which is completely a a false picture. > wht's disturbng question is so subjective. even ur feeling or ability to > understand a discourse also could be subjective, leave alone > caste/gender questions.I AGREE. but in the context of this forum, it > need not arise as 916 gold claim only. (den explain context of ur > stalktaking and mourn exercise for the unsuscribed?) > It could also arise as claims on "activism", "green politics", > "democracy", etc etc. True. I agree. I already said (in another mail)that a group & its descriptions communicate only about the reason to start it. Nearly 4 years are passed. And every unmoderated group is defined by its contributers. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ greenyouth mailinglist is the activist support mailinglist for kerala To post to this group, send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
