It is a valuble piece, (i have been searching for this hateful piece for so long, so, thanks geedha), though i dont know why women (even "problematic" figures like sugathakumari) should be held responsible for their husbands' views, regards, bindu
On 29/09/2007, Ranjit Ranjit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > this is an intersting pieces and the ideas are shared by the person who's > de heroin of our topic dof iscussion here as well > so i feel geedha's forward a valuable one indeed. > we get lot of such forwards from Sudheer devadas, murali, ranjit, ajay, > anivar, venugopal, ck etcetc without any moderation > most of the time these may be unnecessary things only (this is my personal > view only). but i d appreciate these efforts. any forum should encourage > such engagements. if moderators dont know these basic things, try to learn > it at the earlist > thnks > > > On 29/09/2007, Anivar Aravind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Now it is the time for the list to decide is it worth for the list, > > other than exposing the face & concepts of geedha. > > > > Anivar > > geedha geedha wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
