Publication editor of madhyamam clarified certain positions over phone to me today. They have assigned Geetha to write that article. After giving our letter, Geetha's reply and accused person's explanation, they stopped the discussion as couple of takes received were ' focussing on person than issue'.
I apologise to the Madhyamam edit team for making the impression that they were not convinced about Geetha's articel. Now let me raise the crucial question to them [ which I asked him over phone]. If you stopped the discussion when it beceame centred on persons and not issue, why published the article in the first place? Wasn't it full of allegations [ not substatnciated] against a person? Now that you say you stand by that article WHY DIDN'T you or Geetha neither gave an explanation or apology to the reply by accused? Finally, let me confess a ridiculous error commited by me. Ranjith said he meant not Kiliroor but Kottiyam issue . In fact the whole debate I was referring to was on Vithura case. -- Dileep R I thuravoor --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
