From: Human Rights Watch
URL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:45 AM


"Flooding South Lebanon" is the latest in a series of Human Rights Watch
reports documenting the use of cluster munitions around the world. Human
Rights Watch found that the level and density of post-conflict contamination
in southern Lebanon was far worse than the combined contamination
found in Kosovo
in 1999 <http://hrw-news.c.topica.com/maaj8deabE8rjaDfWqMeaeQyvL/>, in
Afghanistan
in 2001-2002 <http://hrw-news.c.topica.com/maaj8deabE8rkaDfWqMeaeQyvL/>, and
in Iraq in 2003 <http://hrw-news.c.topica.com/maaj8deabE8rlaDfWqMeaeQyvL/>.


Among the data gathered by Human Rights Watch on cluster munitions:

   - At least 14 countries and a small number of non-state armed groups
   have used cluster munitions in at least 30 countries and territories;
   - At least 76 countries stockpile cluster munitions;
   - Thirty-four countries have produced more than 210 different types of
   cluster munitions; and
   - At least 13 countries have transferred more than 50 different types
   of cluster munitions to at least 60 other countries, as well to non-state
   armed groups<http://hrw-news.c.topica.com/maaj8deabE8rmaDfWqMeaeQyvL/>
   .

Israel's Use of Cluster Bombs Shows Need for Global Ban Attacks in Lebanon
Violated Laws of War

(Wellington, February 17, 2008) – The human devastation inflicted on Lebanon
by Israel's illegal use of cluster munitions highlights the urgent need for
an international treaty banning the weapon, Human Rights Watch said in
releasing a report today. At a conference this week, more than 100 states
will discuss a treaty to ban cluster munitions, a process prompted in part
by Israel's cluster attacks on Lebanon in 2006.
In the 131-page
report<http://hrw-news.c.topica.com/maaj8deabE8riaDfWqMeaeQyvL/>,
"Flooding South Lebanon: Israel's Use of Cluster Munitions in Lebanon in
July and August 2006," Human Rights Watch found that Israel violated
international humanitarian law in its indiscriminate and disproportionate
cluster munition attacks on Lebanon. The report provides the most
comprehensive and detailed account yet of the nature and impact of Israel's
use of cluster munitions.

"Israel fired huge numbers of cluster bombs into Lebanon, leaving bomblets
that have killed and maimed almost 200 people since the war ended," said
Steve Goose, director of the Arms division at Human Rights Watch. "Only a
global treaty that bans cluster munitions will prevent such tragedies in the
future."

At a five-day conference which starts in Wellington, New Zealand on February
18, 2008 more than 100 countries will discuss the text of a treaty to ban
the production, stockpiling, transfer, and use of cluster munitions that
cause unacceptable harm to civilians. Israel's cluster attacks on Lebanon in
2006 played a major role in sparking the treaty process that began in Oslo
last year and is scheduled to finish later in 2008.

Cluster munitions are large weapons that release dozens or hundreds of
smaller submunitions. Air-dropped or ground-launched, they cause two major
humanitarian problems. First, their wide-area effect virtually guarantees
civilian casualties when they are used in populated areas. Second, many of
the submunitions do not explode on impact as designed, causing civilian
casualties for months or years to come.

Israel rained as many as 4.6 million submunitions across southern Lebanon in
at least 962 separate strikes, the vast majority over the final three days
of the war when Israel knew a settlement was imminent. The 4.6 million
estimate is higher than previously reported by other sources. It is based on
additional information provided to Human Rights Watch by soldiers who fired
cluster munitions from Multiple Launch Rocket Systems.

Israel hit dozens of towns and villages with cluster munitions, causing
long-term and large-scale disruption of the largely agricultural economy.
Human Rights Watch research found that many of the attacks on populated
areas did not appear to have had a specific military target.

The United Nations has estimated that at least hundreds of thousands and
perhaps 1 million submunitions did not explode on impact, but remained
deadly, lingering like landmines. These submunition "duds" have caused about
200 civilian casualties since the war's end, and the toll continues to grow.


Human Rights Watch called on Israel to give deminers precise information to
locate and clear the duds. Despite frequent requests, Israel has refused to
do so, thereby further contributing to ongoing suffering in southern
Lebanon. The UN has complained that Israel has only provided generic maps
without the specific attack sites, and has not provided needed information
on the specific types and quantities of cluster munitions used.

"Israel could quickly reduce the danger to civilians by telling the UN where
it fired cluster munitions, and its refusal to help is shocking," said
Goose.

Human Rights Watch calls for an independent and impartial public inquiry to
assess the lawfulness of Israel's cluster munitions use in Lebanon and to
determine if individual commanders bear responsibility for war crimes.
Israel's continuing failure to mount a credible investigation reaffirms the
need for the UN secretary-general to establish an International Commission
of Inquiry to look at all possible violations of international law,
including cluster munition attacks.

At the end of December 2007, the Israel Defense Forces issued the results of
a second internal inquiry into their use of cluster munitions. The findings
were a predictable whitewash justifying use of the weapon and finding no
violations of international law.

However, the Winograd Commission, an Israeli committee of inquiry, released
its own report on the conduct of the war on January 30, 2008, and its
results mirrored many of Human Rights Watch's findings. It acknowledged that
cluster munitions were used in populated areas and caused post-conflict
civilian casualties, and expressed concern about the "lack of clear orders,
discipline and effective controls." It recommended an independent and public
"re-examination" of the rules surrounding Israel's cluster munition use.

"The Lebanon story is just the latest example of something we've have seen
over and over again: whenever cluster munitions are used, large numbers of
civilians get killed and injured," Goose said. "That is why we should ban
this indiscriminate, inaccurate and unreliable weapon as soon as possible."


Human Rights Watch investigated the conduct of all parties to the 34-day war
in 2006. Human Rights Watch found that Hezbollah also fired cluster
munitions into populated areas of Israel, in violation of international
humanitarian law. The Israeli police told Human Rights Watch the Hezbollah
clusters caused one death and 12 injuries.

Israel used large numbers of older models of cluster munitions, some of
which were produced in the 1970s, with very high failure rates. Most of
these were supplied by the United States.

But even Israel's most advanced submunition – the M85 155mm artillery
submunition with a self-destructing mechanism produced by Israel Military
Industries – performed miserably. Although the manufacturer has touted a
failure rate of less than 1 percent, an independent study by the Norwegian
Defence Research Establishment and others found a failure rate of 10 percent
and higher in southern Lebanon. This experience demonstrates that the
"technical solution" of self-destruct mechanisms and required reliability
standards promoted by some nations in the Oslo Process is not viable.

The Oslo Process, which Israel has not participated in, has garnered wide
support for a global ban on cluster munitions. In addition to the ban, the
treaty will include requirements for clearance of contaminated areas and
assistance to affected individuals and communities.

At the conclusion of the Wellington meeting, states will subscribe to a
declaration endorsing a draft treaty text that will be the basis for final
negotiations in Dublin on May 19-30, 2008. A signing ceremony is expected to
take place in December in Oslo.

"Flooding South Lebanon" is the latest in a series of Human Rights Watch
reports documenting the use of cluster munitions around the world. Human
Rights Watch found that the level and density of post-conflict contamination
in southern Lebanon was far worse than the combined contamination
found in Kosovo
in 1999 <http://hrw-news.c.topica.com/maaj8deabE8rjaDfWqMeaeQyvL/>, in
Afghanistan
in 2001-2002 <http://hrw-news.c.topica.com/maaj8deabE8rkaDfWqMeaeQyvL/>, and
in Iraq in 2003 <http://hrw-news.c.topica.com/maaj8deabE8rlaDfWqMeaeQyvL/>.


Among the data gathered by Human Rights Watch on cluster munitions:

   - At least 14 countries and a small number of non-state armed groups
   have used cluster munitions in at least 30 countries and territories;
   - At least 76 countries stockpile cluster munitions;
   - Thirty-four countries have produced more than 210 different types of
   cluster munitions; and
   - At least 13 countries have transferred more than 50 different types
   of cluster munitions to at least 60 other countries, as well to non-state
   armed groups<http://hrw-news.c.topica.com/maaj8deabE8rmaDfWqMeaeQyvL/>
   .


------------------------------

*Related Material*

Save Civilians: Ban Cluster Munitions by
2008<http://hrw-news.c.topica.com/maaj8deabE8rnaDfWqMeaeQyvL/>
 Special Focus

More on Human Rights Watch's work on Cluster Munitions
<http://hrw-news.c.topica.com/maaj8deabE8roaDfWqMeaeQyvL/>
 Thematic Page

Cluster Munitions
Coalition<http://hrw-news.c.topica.com/maaj8deabE8rpaDfWqMeaeQyvL/>
 Web Site

Flooding South Lebanon: Israel's Use of Cluster Munitions in Lebanon in July
and August 2006 <http://hrw-news.c.topica.com/maaj8deabE8riaDfWqMeaeQyvL/>
 Report, February 18, 2008
------------------------------

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to