2) we have our own reservations about popular palastine movement like hamas, fatah n all, though we don't ridicule the struggles like red-intellectuals do on Chengara.
6 & 7) i came to know later when i saw a coimbatore cpim congress news on kairali tv supporting palastine struggle that comrade gp's appeal was not as 'innocent' or 'harmless" as i thought. 8) dileep will never be able to work with comrade gp on Chengara issue and be happy. (may be if cpim is not in power, yes it cud be). 9) dileep, 'we' are your friends. no insult :) 10) these red-intellectuals are not afraid or ashamed, but arrogant even in their silence. that's why whenver comrade gp gets some secret mails on ciA backing of Chengara struggle, he jumps up and forwards. On 3/30/08, Dileep Raj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > These are my (after)thoughts on issues related to G.P.Ramachandran. > 1. Nobody in greenyouth valorised the abusive mail sent to his inbox. > Moreover, the person who sent it publicly apologised to him. > 2.Nobody active in this forum took negative poition on Palestine or > Gujarath > 3.To my knowledge, nobody except GPRamachandran in this forum supported > CPIM on Nandigram issue. > 4. Though members have radical political disagreements on many issues > including night Vigil, > nobody except GPRamachandran in this forum is a member of Purogamana kala > Sahitya Sangham. > 5.What crime did I commit by reminding everybody that G P Ramachandran > supported CPIM on Nandigram > and is morally obliged to explain Pu Ka Sa's position on Night Vigil? > Just because RSS resisted emergency, > can we consider them as democratic?Shouldn't we remind them of Gujarath > when they appeal us to > support human rights issues in other parts of the world? > 6.While forwarding an appeal on an issue related to rights violation in > Israel to this list, > is GPRamachandran addressing me as well? If yes, don't I have the right to > speak back? If he was > anticipating action from certain individuals only ( non CIA people, , for > example) he should have made it clear. > On that particular issue, does G P Ramachandran accept 'us' ( i.e: > individuals who condemn Nandigram > party/police brutality and support Chengara struggle) as allies?For > instance , if Delhi Forum activists are members of > Greenyouth , should they respond to his call? > 7.Which are the democratic forces he foresee as allies in the fight > against fascism in Israel? Does he envisage Chengara activists as part of > that democratic front?( Or is it so that the 'decent' response to the > "forwarded appeals" is silence/negligence and they are meant as > advertisements of the 'sender's?!) > 8.With all political differences I will be happy to work with > GPRamachandran on Chengara issue if he takes a positive stand on it > ( as I am sure that he is not getting CIA support) > 9.Isn't he insulting those who took part in the discussion by branding > them as "Dileep Raj"s friends? > 10.WHY ARE YOU AFRAID AND ASHAMED OF YOUR AVOWED POSITION ON NANDIGRAM > AND CHENGARA? > > -- > Dileep R I thuravoor > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
