The issue remains the same . How to view such
visuals.

Whatever the rationalisations and commentary, the
way Sakshi codes such visuals assures that the impact is antiwoman.

I think it was the same MLA who took broom , provoked by
the 'visuals' in Kairali news and Sakshi about Night Vigil.
I don't believe in "poetic" or "filmic" justice. From justice's vantage
point we all should
stand by her in the (whole) issue.


On 6/23/08, Anivar Aravind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Attaching 2 Reports  (From Times of India and Mangalam)
>
> They should have stopped Sakshi when Chengara solidarity night vigil
> was scandalized!
>
> Anivar
>
>
> From:   Sudhir Devadas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> OFFENSIVE TV CLIP
>
> *CPM MLA goes to police against her party channel*
>
> */Ananthakrishnan G | TNN /*
>
>
>
> Thiruvananthapuram: A CPM woman MLA has approached Kerala police against
> party-backed Malayalam channel *Kairali TV* after it aired photographs
> showing her being groped at a public function attended among others by
> chief minister V S Achutanandan. The MLA, who represents a constituency
> in Kozhikode district, has alleged that the photos and video were
> fabricated and spread with the intent of maligning her.
>
>
>
>
> Photographs of the incident were telecast in a programme called 'Sakshi'
> (witness) on the channel in the last week of April. They relate to the
> inauguration of the Meppayur bridge by VS. Video clips of the event
> being aired now shows a member of the CPM Kozhikode district committee
> taking full advantage of the rush and laying his hands on the woman MLA
> as VS inches forward to cut the ribbon. She is then seen biting the
> man's hand struggling to ward him off.
>
>
> 'Sakshi' has gone off air since then. Sources say that given its damage
> potential, the party would have liked to see the dust settle itself, but
> then complicating matters the MLA approached the police. The matter is
> now pending with the cyber crime cell.
>
>
> IG cyber crimes cell Loknath Behera told TOI that the police was facing
> a problem in the probe as the digital part of the pictures were not
> available any more. "We are trying to locate the digital part. Only then
> can we say if it is morphed or not,'' he said.
>
>
> Kairali TV MD John Britas denied that the channel had anything to do
> with the developments. "There is no manipulation from our part. The
> programme is produced by a private television house called NTV. We only
> air it.''
>
>
> Reached for comments, NTV MD Leen B Jesmas said he had received the
> photographs via email. "We did not know that the lady in it was the MLA.
> So we went ahead and included it in the episode. Our confidence was that
> if there was anything against any party member, the channel would cut it
> out during preview. But nothing of that sort happened and the pictures
> were broadcast with her face masked,'' said Leen. He stressed that the
> only intention was to convey that such miscreants could make it even to
> functions attended by the CM.
>
>
> Attempts to reach the MLA did not materialize as she was away at an
> official function. But reports maintain she has taken the view that the
> pictures were morphed and were spread to damage her image.
>
>
> Sources say the incident has also aggravated fault lines in the party
> with one section trying to wish it away and the other demanding action
> against the party man if the incident was true.
>
>
>
> *
> http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Daily/skins/TOI/navigator.asp?Daily=TOIBG&login=default
>
> <
> http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Daily/skins/TOI/navigator.asp?Daily=TOIBG&login=default
> >*
>
> --
> sudhir
>
> >
>
>


-- 
Dileep R  I  thuravoor

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to