The country by definition belongs even to the Hindus (including the dalits)


I am not sure whther Dalits constitute ONLY Hindus or not. There could be
Hindus; as they could be christians, muslims, sikh, buddhist. This is
against a Gandhian way of looking at Dalits as 'harijans'. harijan can be
only a hindu, but not a Dalit. In fact, taking strong polemical cues from
Ialiah, Dalits may prefer to say "Why we are not Hindus" !
and this nation hardly belongs to Dalits. I think ambedkar said that Dalits
have no motherland or nation..

and who were the people killed in Orissa? and why some Bishop in kerala said
that Khandmal is a minor issue compared to the text book controversy?

 the minority issue can't be seen in isolation.

even in Maharashtra, why only Biharis and Upites are constructed as
"outsiders" and not rich caste hindu Gujaratis, and Settus..

and abt DAlit cause: Dalit emancipation and the fight agaisnt caste system
emancipate not only the DAlit but also others as well icluding the brahmin
from the bondage of caste. The brahmin bz of their high position in the
power structure enjoys the bondage and may not want to get rid of it.

Valerian Rodrigues' Essential Writings of ambedkar carries a small chapter
on  the representation  of minorities.. (OUP)

I think Dalits are a minority community in India (a new religion in the
making), though its claims for it has not been accede to. They are bound to
be alive t oserve the caste Hindu as "slaves". however, the comparison that
who is worst than worse may not help the cause. As u can see anti-DAlit
sentiments among muslims/christians/parsies (ambedkar;s autobiographical
notes) and strong anti-muslim/christians sentiments among Hindu SCs ( i m
deliberately not using the term Dalit here, as i think as a theoretical
field DAlit can't encompass such an anti-minority position and it is against
the very political/cultural potential it inherit)

the issue of Othering of minority communities has to be seen in the context
of internal hindu colonisation and the attempt to mask the
anti-Brahmin/anti-caste movements/Dalit movements in the country
against it. At the surface level it may appear to be between Hindu vs Muslim
(as in gujrat) or hindu vs christian (as in orissa), but a deeper
interrogation may unearth an altogether differnt story. but we need to have
the guts to see that side as well.

why should one return to ambedkar? for me it should be to think beyond him.
 and one should be cautious not to  take  the route of "postcolonial
orientalism" practised by many a post colonial thinkers which eulogises the
orientalist glory againt a colonial past and refuses to see the diverse
terrains that struggled(s) against this "golden orient"

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to