I hope saying this will not offend anyone (it is not intended to) but I have 
some doubts about how everyone seems to agree this is the worst thing to happen 
to India in years. As far as I can see these attacks in Mumbai stand out 
because of their spectacular nature--the Taj hotel and the Oberoi being 
attacked and rich and foreign guests being taken hostage creates enormous 
'spectacular' value (just like 9/11 did). And because of the spectacular media 
effect and because the terrorits were targetting cosmopolitan circles, the 
repercusions for India in terms of global investor confidence and these kind of 
things will be much greater than with other instances of violence. In that 
sense it is somewhat understandable that the events get so much more coverage. 
But why should critical social activists consider this terrorist attack any 
worse, in ethical terms, than other instances of violence that have occured in 
India lately? Why is it, as Faking News suggests, ok to have commercial 
breakes when reporting on terror attacks where ordinary Indians in ordinary 
places were killed but can we not have commercial breakes when also rich elites 
and foreigners are targetted and economic national interests are directly at 
stake? Obviously I think these commerical breakes during news reporting are 
always pretty repugnant but I ask you to explain to me why they are any more so 
now than when only ordinary people are killed. Is it an attack on "India" when 
the Taj hotel is in flames, but not so when a dalit hut is burning? This is 
what elites and the media of course would like us to take for granted but 
I feel I must resist this....
Luisa

 



________________________________
From: bobinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Greenyouth <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, 29 November, 2008 11:25:01
Subject: [GreenYouth] Mumbai terror attacks by media


even, fakingnews, a portal which runs fake/funny news items showed their 
responsibility
in sharing the pain & terror in Mumbai for last couple of days.

http://www.fakingnews.com/2008/11/mumbai-terror-attacks-by-media.html


http://www.enidhi.net/2008/11/impose-delay-on-live-reporting.html

The rest of the media was celebrating the invasion as if they are showing an 
Hollywood movie trailer !

is there a provision to take action against the media ? 

~ bobinson
--
http://freebird.in





      
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to