The Climate Imperative

*By Rajendra Kumar Pachauri*

07 July, 2009
*Project Syndicate * <http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/pachauri1>

*NEW DELHI *– Today, international action on climate change is urgent and
essential. Indeed, there can no longer be any debate about the need to act,
because the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), of which I am
chairman, has established climate change as an unequivocal reality beyond
scientific doubt.

For instance, changes are taking place in precipitation patterns, with a
trend toward higher precipitation levels in the world’s upper latitudes and
lower precipitation in some sub-tropical and tropical regions, as well as in
the Mediterranean area. The number of extreme precipitation events is also
increasing – and are increasingly widespread. Moreover, the frequency and
intensity of heat waves, floods, and droughts are on the rise.

This change in the amount and pattern of rainfall has serious implications
for many economic activities, as well as for countries’ preparedness to
handle emergencies such as large-scale coastal flooding or heavy snowfall.

Some parts of the world are more vulnerable than others to these changes.
The Arctic region, in particular, has been warming at twice the rate of the
rest of the globe. Coral reefs, mega-deltas (which include cities like
Shanghai, Kolkata, and Dhaka), and small island states are also extremely
vulnerable to rising sea levels.

Other negative effects of climate change include possible reductions in crop
yields. In some African countries, for example, yields could decline by as
much as 50% by 2020. Climate change would also lead to increased water
stress, which by 2020 could affect 75-250 million people in Africa alone.

Overall, temperature increases are projected to increase by the year 2100
within a range of 1.1 to 6.4˚C. In order to focus on this set of outcomes,
the IPCC has come up with a best estimate at the lower end of this range of
1.8˚C, and 4˚C at the upper end. Even at the lower estimate, the
consequences of climate change could be severe in several parts of the
world, including an increase in water stress, serious effects on ecosystems
and food security, and threats to life and property as a result of coastal
flooding.

There also may be serious direct consequences for human health if climate
change is not checked, particularly increased morbidity and mortality as a
result of heat waves, floods, and droughts. Moreover, the distribution of
some diseases would change, making human populations more vulnerable.

Because the impact of climate change is global, it is essential that the
world as a whole take specific measures to adapt. But it is already clear
that the capacity of some communities to adapt will quickly be exceeded if
climate change goes unmitigated.

To help these most vulnerable communities, it is essential for the world to
devise a plan of action to limit the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs).
Several scenarios have been assessed by the IPCC, and one that would limit
future temperature increase to between 2.0-2.4˚C would require that
emissions peak no later than 2015, and decline thereafter. The rate of
decline would then determine the extent to which the worst effects of
climate change can be avoided.

The IPCC also found that the cost of such a strict effort at mitigation
would not exceed 3% of global GDP in 2030. Moreover, there are enormous
co-benefits to mitigation: lower emissions of GHGs would be accompanied by
lower air pollution and increased energy security, agricultural output, and
employment. If these co-benefits were taken fully into account, that price
tag of 3% of GDP in 2030 would be substantially lower, perhaps even
negative. The world could actually enhance economic output and welfare by
pursuing a path of mitigation.

The need for international action, therefore, stems from two important
observations arising out of the IPCC’s work. First, if we do not mitigate
emissions of GHGs, the negative effects of climate change will be difficult
to reverse, implying great hardship and possibly danger to mankind and other
species.

Second, the benefits of mitigating emissions of GHGs are so overwhelming
that this, combined with the prospect of the harm resulting from inaction,
makes it imperative for the world to devise an international response and a
plan of action. Given the challenge facing us, the magnitude and nature of
which were clearly brought out by the IPCC, the Copenhagen Conference later
this year must produce a multi-lateral agreement that deals adequately with
climate change.

R. K. Pachauri, a Nobel Laureate, is Chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change and Director-General of the Energy & Resources Institute.

© 2009 Project Syndicate




 **

-

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to