found this interesting post criticising CPI(M) on this matter from another
mailing list:
CPM against Abhaya Case

<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/marthomachurch/message/41747;_ylc=X3oDMTJyaDFhYjdzBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzIwOTM4NzYEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA3MjEwMDQ2BG1zZ0lkAzQxNzQ3BHNlYwNkbXNnBHNsawN2bXNnBHN0aW1lAzEyNDg1OTQ4MDc->Posted
by: "koch oonj" [email protected]
<http://uk.mc329.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]&Subject=%20Re%3ACPM%20against%20Abhaya%20Case>
  koch_oonj <http://profiles.yahoo.com/koch_oonj>Sat Jul 25, 2009 1:44 pm
(PDT)

The CPI(M), choking under a tsunami of unpopularity in Kerala following the
CBI-probed SNC Lavalin corruption case in which its secretary Pinarayi
Vijayan is seventh accused, is on a bid to cash in on the sensational Sr
Abhaya murder case by going all out against the Central agency, which is
probing the murder also.

The move of the CPI(M) is said to be two-pronged as attacks against the CBI
over the nun murder case are aimed at establishing that it is an agency with
no credibility or ethical perspective, a move for defending itself in the
SNC Lavalin case, and at the same time wooing the powerful Catholic Church
which is at loggerheads with the party over several matters.

The CPI(M) had never expressed any serious opinion on the Sr Abhaya case so
far, as it had been seeing it as yet another criminal case, but two feeder
outfits of the party – the CITU and the All India Democratic Women’s
Association – came out against the CBI for its conduct in the probe within a
span of a couple of days. The move by these outfits is seen as a test of the
situation from the part of the CPI(M) before deciding whether it should
directly intervene to woo the Church.

Observers are of the opinion that the CPI(M) is on such a bid out of sheer
necessity at a time when it is facing the biggest wave of unpopularity since
the time of the first communist government headed by (late) EMS
Namboothitipad. In such a situation, the party, by making its feeder outfits
to raise criticisms against the CBI, is trying to woo the Church, as almost
all other communities have distanced themselves from the Marxists.

With huge sections of people turning against it for over the alleged
involvement of Pinarayi Vijayan in the graft case, the poll alliance with
Abudl Nasser Madani’s PDP, the lopsided agreement with the self-financing
professional college managements, the administrative failures of the VS
Achuthanandan regime, the CPI(M) is feeling that it is necessary for the
party to win back the support of the Church.

The other aspect of the CPI(M) feeder outfits’ comments on the Sr Abhaya
case is that the party this as an opportunity to show to the people how
incredible and biased the CBI could be, in the particular context of the SNC
Lavalin case. It is worth noting that the feeder outfits are questioning the
moral integrity and credibility of the agency and not its ability to probe
cases.

The first criticism against the CBI in the Sr Abhaya case had come from
Politburo member Brinda Karat, wife of CPI(M) general secretary Prakash
Karat, who had allegedly gone out of the way to defend Pinarayi Vijayan over
the CBI case on the Rs 374.5-crore SNC Lavalin case. Brinda, as leader of
the All India Democratic Women’s Association, wrote to the Prime Minister to
complain against the CBI for the obscene language it had used in the
chargesheet to explain the results of the virginity test held on nun Sr
Seffi, third accused in the Sr Abhaya case.

Observers point out that this intervention could be nothing but sheer
politics as this is not the first time that a probe agency has been
conducting virginity tests on victims or accused, and the move by Brinda
itself was quite unexpected as the general thinking in the Kerala CPI(M) has
been that the agency is on the right track in the Sr Abhaya case.

They say that the party has a feeling that this is a good opportunity to
declare solidarity with the Church which is in a spot over the charges made
against three of its senior personalities in the case. Sr Seffi herself is
preparing to approach the Supreme Court against the virginity test and the
CBI’s “obscene” references to sexuality in the chargesheet.

The CITU’s complaint against the CBI is also equally important as it has
raised the same points against the CBI as those by the Catholic Church. The
trade union has questioned the authority of the probe agency to suspect the
expertise of the officials at the Centre for Development of Imaging
Technology (C-DIT), Thiruvananthapuram, who had found that the CDs of the
narco-analyses of the accused priests and nun in the case were extensively
manipulated.

There is no reason why the Catholic Church should reject the CPI(M) feeder
outfits’ pro-
Church stand in the case and the party wants to use this as an opportunity
to reopen dialogues with the clergy in its bid to win back the believers’
support, observers point out.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to