''I would have shared many things about Kannur activism; but not now.''
-----why?

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 1:52 AM, gk31.vinod gk31.vinod <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Unbelievable !
> Does this happen in kerala, that too in KANNUR, the marxist's own land !
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 7:47 PM, jenny rowena <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Dear Friends, Most of you must be aware of Chithra Lekha *(please see
>> details of her case below)* and her brave struggle to make a living as an
>> auto rickshaw driver in Kannur, Kerala. Many of us had contributed to help
>> her procure an auto rickshaw after it was burned, allegedly by CITU
>> activists.
>>
>>
>> Recently, Chithra Lekha was trapped in what she says is a false case and
>> taken to the police station and beaten up. Though she has been let off now,
>> she has many injuries and has no way to question the violence that has
>> happened to her. *(A detailed report of the incident by Venugopal who
>> visited Chithra Lekha and talked to her, is given below).*
>>
>>
>>
>> Though  a few people have been trying for a whole day, we are finding it
>> difficult to get many people at the local level to intervene actively in
>> this case. There are not many who are ready to stand against the CPM or
>> CITU. And some of those who raised their voices are penalised for the same.
>> Chithra finds herself alone in many ways and is so distressed that she is
>> even thinking of surrendering the auto rickshaw that she has procured with
>> all our help and going back to the life of exile as before If this happens
>> then it would be like the local goons have succeeded in driving out a Dalit
>> woman from her village and stopped her from doing the work that she had
>> wanted and chosen to do.
>>
>>
>>
>> Friends if we do not do anything now soon it might be too late. It would
>> be like we are standing and watching while a woman who has put up such a
>> brave struggle is ostracized and thrown out of her own native place. Let us
>> please all stand in solidarity  with Chithra Lekha at this juncture.
>> Please respond to this issue as soon as possible.
>>
>>
>>
>> We are thinking of a fact finding commission and also making the issue
>> publicly known. Whoever is interested in joining the commission please write
>> to us.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please make this issue known widely and let as many people as possible
>> decide to intervene.
>>
>>
>>
>> Also please call up Chithra Lekha and extend your moral support to her at
>> this point.
>>
>> Here are her numbers:  *9526128764* and *9744361941*
>>
>>
>>
>> Any other help and suggestion is also welcome
>>
>>
>>
>> Anil Tharayath Varghese – 009971170738
>>
>> K M Venugopal - 9447488215
>>
>> Jenny Rowena P - 09868216719
>>
>> Carmel Christy – 09958500931
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Given below is a Report of what happened recently by K M Venugopal, who
>> was a member of the 2008, Chithra Lekha rehabilitation committee:*
>>
>>
>>
>> The Payyanur Auto Workers, CITU is again continuing its policy of hatred
>> toward the couple, one of whom is a dalit woman whose auto rickshaw had
>> been set fire and destroyed in 2005 December, following a series of  
>> incidents
>> of harassment at work place. The incident narrated by Chithralekha and her
>> husband Sreeshkanth, is
>> as follows:
>>
>> This morning, Chithralekha was about to park her auto rikshaw in front of
>> a medical shop to buy medicine for their son who had received a sting by
>> honey bee. She was also accompanied by Sreeshkanth, her husband. One  Mr
>> Ramachandran who is an office bearer of the Autorikhaw Union of  Payyanur
>> menacingly asked her to move her auto away from the parking spot. She
>> replied that she had the lawful permit to park and had every right to do so.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> An altercation followed  between the couple and a few auto workers. After
>> a few moments, a police jeep arrived and bundled the couple to the vehicle.
>> They got severely beatings by the autoworkers even as they got into the jeep
>> and in presence of the police. When Chithralekha told the Inspector that her
>> valuables and cash were inside the auto rickshaw, the officer assured them
>> that that would be taken care of.
>>
>>
>> After reaching the Police Station, the couple were severely beaten. A
>> woman  police Officer beat Chithralekha black and blue and her sari was
>> almost pulled off. Later, Sreeshkanth was taken to the hospital for a check
>> for intoxication; though Chithralekha also was compelled to get  examined,
>> she  protested and resisted the move, sensing  that the police were
>> acting  in a biased manner and they would get her booked for driving
>> inebriated under a false testimony by some doctor.
>>
>> Chithralekha was later released but had to go to the hospital due to her
>> injuries. She has injuries all over the body and also in the lower stomach.
>> She is not only in great pain, but is also left almost alone without no help
>> from any one in questioning the actions of the union workers and the police.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *The Chithra Lekha Case*
>>
>> * *
>>
>> Chithra Lekha was born into a Pulaya family, which is an ex-untouchable
>> caste in Keralam. After her marriage to Shreeshanth a Thiyya (an OBC caste)
>> auto driver, she went on to buy an auto rickshaw - KL 13L 8527 in Chitra
>> Lekha’s name under the PMRY loan scheme.
>>
>> The auto stand in Payyannur in which Chithra Lekha wanted to drive her
>> auto was controlled by the CITU, the trade union that belongs to the
>> Communist Party of India, Marxist (CPI (M)). In order to drive her auto,
>> Chithra Lekha had to be granted a membership card from the CITU. This card
>> was delayed for more than 2 months as the party was already angry with
>> Chithra Lekha for having married above her caste.
>>
>> In spite of such harassment Chithra Lekha turned out to be a competent
>> driver and became very popular with her customers, especially women. When
>> she started her career there had been a coin operated phone at the auto
>> stand where the customers would call for drivers. Soon, Chithra Lekha
>> started getting the most number of calls from this phone. This she feels
>> disturbed her fellow male drivers. After a few months she bought a mobile
>> phone and now people started calling for her even more than before. This
>> made the drivers feel even more threatened.
>>
>>
>>
>> All these problems took a violent turn during the Navami or Saraswathy
>> Pooja days when Chithra Lekha placed her auto in the common Pandal for *
>> pooja*. When she came to take back the auto on the next day, that is on
>> October 11, 2005, she found that the hood of her auto was torn. Ajith, one
>> of the CITU members who had threatened her earlier was standing there and
>> she asked him why did he tore the hood. He retaliated saying that if you
>> don’t keep your limits you will also be torn like this. She complained about
>> the incident to Rameshan, fellow auto driver and the Secretary of the local
>> branch of CITU, but to no avail. Since there was no response from Rameshan
>> or CITU, she lodged a complaint with the police after two days. When she
>> came back to the stand on October 14th Rameshan gave her a two hour
>> punishment of abstention, for having taken the case out of the stand to the
>> police station. Chithra Lekha declined to obey it, at which point an angry
>> Rameshan tried to run over Chithra Lekha with his auto. She moved to the
>> other side of the road and escaped the attack. However she sustained minor
>> injuries and had to be hospitalized. Yet another compliant was lodged
>> against Rameshan and he was arrested. Immediately CITU members unleashed a
>> poster campaign in support of Rameshan. They stuck posters and wrote on the
>> walls of the panchayath that Chithra Lekha and her mother were loose women
>> who were bringing up the issue of caste only to hide their immoral natures.
>> Soon, violence took its worst form when her auto was burned to ashes on the
>> small hours of December 30th 2005. With the help of Ayyappan Master, a
>> Dalit activist and member of the police committee to prevent atrocities
>> against SC/STs, Chithra Lekha lodged a complaint against six CITU members
>> including Ajith and Rameshan. The case was registered under IPC 143, 147,
>> 148, 341, 352, 324, 294 (B), 506 (1), SC/ST S3 (1) XI R/W and 149. An action
>> committee was also formed to protest against what happened and also to
>> rehabilitate Chithra Lekha  **
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Green Youth Movement" group.
>> To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<greenyouth%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Green Youth Movement" group.
> To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<greenyouth%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB.

Reply via email to