http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/More-hungry-in-India-than-in-Sudan/articleshow/6733033.cms

<http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/More-hungry-in-India-than-in-Sudan/articleshow/6733033.cms>More
hungry in India than in SudanRukmini Shrinivasan, TNN, Oct 12, 2010, 03.30am
IST

NEW DELHI: India <http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/India> dropped
two ranks to 67th among 84 developing countries in the International Food
Policy Research Institute's annual " Global Hunger
Index<http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/search?q=Global%20Hunger%20Index>"
for 2010. Even Sudan <http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/Sudan>, North
Korea and Pakistan <http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/Pakistan> rank
higher than India.

While the report, released on Monday, shows that the proportion of
undernourished in India is decreasing, the worsening ranking indicates that
other developing countries have done better in tackling hunger. India is
home to 42% of the underweight children under the age of five in the world.

The policymakers in India, who are are still fighting over the need to have
an expansive National Food Security
Act<http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/search?q=Food%20Security%20Act>,
should look at the following data more closely: in 2005-06, about 44% of
Indian children — below five years — were underweight, and nearly half — 48%
— were stunted.

The food insecurity is so rampant across the country that India is clubbed
with minor economies like
Bangladesh<http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/Bangladesh>,
Timor-Leste and Yemen <http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/Yemen>,
recording the highest prevalence of underweight in children under five.

At the beginning of the liberalization era in the early 90s, 24% of the
population was undernourished. The situation marginally improved to 22%
between 2004 and 2006. Almost 60% of children below five were recorded as
underweight in 1988-92. The condition has remained dismal as the latest
figure shows 43.5% between 2003-08.

The GHI ranks countries on a scale of 100, with 0 being the best score (no
hunger) and 100 the worst. It is composed of three equally weighted
indicators: the proportion of undernourished in the population, the
prevalence of those underweight in children under five and the under-five
mortality rate.

The figures for India are 22% (as of 2004-6), 43.5% (2003-8) and 6.9% as of
2008, respectively. These give India a composite GHI of 24.1, which is
classified as alarming in terms of the food security situation.

The strife-torn Democratic Republic of Congo ranks at the bottom of the list
of 84 countries with significant levels of hunger. The data has been
compiled for 122 countries in all; the remaining 38 countries have a GHI of
less than 5 and are not included in the rankings. No data has been recorded
for highly developed countries.

South Asia <http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/South-Asia> has the
highest GHI for any region in the world, at 22.9. The region has, however,
made greater progress since 1990 than sub-Saharan
Africa<http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/Africa>,
the report adds. India is ranked below all other major South Asian countries
— Sri Lanka <http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/Sri-Lanka> is ranked
39th, Pakistan 52nd and Nepal<http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/Nepal>
 56th.

India's hunger is not purely a product of its middle-income status. While
economic progress and hunger levels tend to be inversely correlated
(countries with higher gross national income typically have lower GHI
scores), some countries are exceptions to the norm.
China<http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/China> has
lower hunger levels than its GNI per capita would suggest, while India has
higher hunger levels than would be expected from its income per capita,
calculations made by the report's authors show.

The 2010 report focuses on child malnutrition, which is the biggest
component of hunger worldwide. In India, high 2010 GHI scores are driven by
high levels of underweight children, resulting from the low nutritional and
social status of women in the country, the report says.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB.

Reply via email to