http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article1120837.ece

<http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article1120837.ece>
Published: January 24, 2011 14:14 IST | Updated: January 25, 2011 02:00 IST
Jethmalani kicks off Binayak Sen's defenceAman Sethi

“What have I been charged with? At least, tell me what I have done,” said
Ram Jethmalani, in a packed courtroom, “Have I committed sedition by words
spoken, or written? Have I caused hatred or contempt, or have I excited
disaffection?”

Appearing for Dr. Binayak Sen in the Chhattisgarh High Court at Bilaspur,
counsel Ram Jethmalani argued for the suspension of sentence and grant of
bail to the paediatrician and rights activist on the grounds that the
judgment of a lower court violated the established tenets of jurisprudence.

On December 24 last, Judge B.P. Verma of the Raipur Additional District and
Sessions Court ruled that Dr. Sen had passed on three letters written by the
alleged Maoist Narayan Sanyal, an inmate of the Raipur central jail, to
Pijush Guha, a Kolkata-based businessman. The judge convicted the three men
of the charge of conspiracy to commit sedition and sentenced them to life
imprisonment.

In his arguments, Mr. Jethmalani first focussed on the prosecution case and
then turned his attention to the judgment.

*‘Three points”*

“I have three points,” Mr. Jethmalani said: the prosecution produced no
admissible evidence to prove that Dr. Sen delivered the letters; the
prosecution's own evidence excluded the possibility that the letters were
exchanged; and Dr. Sen was never allowed to explain or contradict the
inferences gleaned from the circumstantial evidence gathered against him.

On May 6, 2007, Mr. Guha was arrested near the Raipur railway station and
allegedly found in possession of three letters. When questioned, Mr. Guha
was said to have told the police that the letters had been written by Mr.
Sanyal and delivered to him by Dr. Sen. Prison records show that Dr. Sen
visited Mr. Sanyal 33 times in jail. A search of Dr. Sen's house yielded
literature termed ‘seditious' by the prosecution.

Dr. Sen denies having acted as a courier and says he visited Mr. Sanyal in
his capacity as a physician and as secretary of the People's Union for Civil
Liberties, and that the visits were authorised by the jail authorities.

Mr. Jethmalani argued that as per the Evidence Act of 1872, a confession
made by an accused before a police officer was not admissible as evidence in
court, and hence the prosecution could not use Mr. Guha's confession against
Dr. Sen. He then quoted from the testimonies of several jailers from the
Raipur jail to prove that jail staff strictly supervised all meetings
between Dr. Sen and Mr. Sanyal, making it impossible to exchange any letter.

Turning his attention to the charge of sedition, Mr. Jethmalani cited two
landmark judgments — the 1962 Supreme Court ruling in Kedernath vs the State
of Bihar, and the 1971 Gujarat High Court ruling in Manubhai Tribhovandas
Patel vs the State of Gujarat.

In the first instance, Mr. Jethmalani said, the court held that a charge of
sedition could be upheld if only it was proved that the accused acted to
incite violence or public disorder.

In the second, the High Court cited the Kedarnath judgment and allowed the
publication and circulation of a Gujarati translation of the speeches of Mao
Zedong, thereby implying that possessing Maoist literature in itself would
not constitute a seditious act as long as the possessor did not incite
violence or public disorder.

Commenting on the Raipur Additional District and Sessions Court's judgment,
Mr. Jethmalani said Judge Verma's observations suggested “an ignorance of
Sections 212 and 213 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.PC).”

The two Sections required that the charges framed against an accused
establish the manner, mode and particulars of an offence.

Mr. Jethmalani felt that the judgment was not sufficiently specific.

“When was this conspiracy hatched? Where was this conspiracy hatched…Before
you charge me with sedition, you must mention the manner and mode of
sedition.”

The arguments will continue on Tuesday.

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB.

Reply via email to