Assad must go? Obama administration's focus on Syria in doubt as death
  toll soars

Barnini Chakraborty <http://www.foxnews.com/archive/barnini-chakraborty>

By Barnini Chakraborty <http://www.foxnews.com/archive/barnini-chakraborty>

Published July 29, 2014
FoxNews.com <http://www.foxnews.com/>

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/07/29/administration-focus-syria-death-toll/?intcmp=latestnews

In this photo released by the Syrian official news agency SANA, Syria's
President Bashar Assad reviews an honor guard upon his arrival at the
presidential palace to take the oath of office for his third seven-year
term in Damascus, Syria, Wednesday, July 16, 2014.AP

WASHINGTON - The rise of ISIS militants in Syria and Iraq, and the
unwillingness of Americans to see their military involved in another
foreign conflict, appear to have cooled President Obama's once-strident
rhetoric demanding Syrian President Bashar al-Assad "must go" -- even as
the death toll in the three-year-old civil war tops 170,000.

"Syria is a mess and Assad has managed to hold onto power," Chris
Preble, Cato Institute's vice president for foreign policy studies, told
FoxNews.com.

"I'm not convinced that President Obama gave up on the idea" of forcing
Assad from power, Preble said. "He just realized how unpopular it was,"
adding, "America has very limited ability to affect the outcome in Syria."

Still, as new crises appear on the Obama administration's radar
seemingly every week, and with foreign fighters and Islamic radicals
streaming into the region, the Syrian death toll mounts as the
administration is being accused of easing off its pledge to help rebel
fighters -- and considering a policy of backing the lesser of evils.

A report Monday from the Obama administration's own State Department
reveals that the Syrian civil war effectively has driven out the
country's Christian population. In the city of Homs, alone, the
Christian population has declined from 160,000, to barely 1,000.

And fresh casualty figures from the London-based Syrian Observatory for
Human Rights, as reported by Reuters, say at least 700 people were
killed in a 48-hour period two weeks ago that represented "the bloodiest
fighting since the civil war began in 2011."

That same group put casualties at more than 171,509, as of July 8 --
though they believe the actual number could be much higher.

And 56,495 -- or one-third of total casualties -- are listed as
civilians, including 9,092 children.

Frustration over the situation within the Obama administration spilled
over last February with the resignation of America's ambassador to
Damascus, Robert Ford, who said he no longer could defend the
administration's Syria policy. Since then, Ford has stepped up his
criticism, claiming the administration is failing to address the
conflict's root causes while haphazardly addressing the escalation of
violence.

"The situation in Syria has gone from bad to very bad to still worse,
and the measures we have taken have been, in most cases, too little and
too late," Ford told NPR in a radio interview.

And Obama's "Assad must go" rhetoric appears to have lost its influence
on Capitol Hill lawmakers.

Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Bob Corker, R-Tenn., have been among the
most vocal to accuse the White House of being too passive in Syria.
During a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing last week, Corker
shrugged off the idea of funneling another $500 million to aid the
Syrian opposition.

"I question how effective that's  gonna be," he told Elissa Slotkin, a
Defense Department official, at the hearing. "Did the administration
really, truly think it could move the needle?"

Slotkin countered, "Sir, you can't fight something with nothing."

"Can you fight something with almost nothing?" Corker shot back.

Slotkin said the plan was to "start small and move up significantly in
scale and numbers," but her answers were met with a collective eye-roll
by panel members.

State Department and other officials are continuing to pledge U.S.
support for certain members of the opposition, but lately it's been more
talk than action.

Asked during a July 24 State Department briefing if the U.S. was
satisfied with the pace of progress and aid going to the Syrian rebels,
spokeswoman Marie Harf seemed to indicate it was.

"We know they are fighting very big challenges on several fronts, both
from the regime and from ISIS and Nusra and the terrorists that we've
seen there," Harf said. "So it's a huge challenge. We're continuing to
increase our assistance."

Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki also insisted last week that, despite
Assad's Damascus inauguration, he "has no more credibility now than he
did before the so-called presidential election."

Still, it would appear at least that the ongoing slaughter in Syria has
been pushed into the administration's foreign policy background,
replaced by such recent crises as the downing of Malaysia Airlines
Flight 17 and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in Gaza.

And that lack of attention appears to have helped stabilize Assad's
position -- along with the support of Syria's long-time ally Russian
President Vladimir Putin, who has worked behind the scenes to diminish
America's global voice in the Syrian crisis.

When the U.S. -- with the backing of other Western countries -- called
on Assad to back down, Putin responded by sending Assad's army cash and
weapons.

And when Assad crossed Obama's so-called "red line" on chemical weapons
use, it was Putin -- not Obama -- who stepped up and brokered a solution
in which the U.S. backed away from air strikes in return for Syria
handing over its chemical weapons stockpile.

Assad, meanwhile, used his inauguration to declare victory against the
U.S.-backed push to oust him -- a reality that Lebanese commentator
Hisham Melhem believes could have widespread consequences.

"We may never know for sure if Putin's decisions in Ukraine were
encouraged by Obama's passivity in Syria," Melhem said in an article
posted on the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights website. "What we know
for sure, is that the Russian president was not deterred because of
anything the American president did in Syria."

Melhem believes those "less charitable" to Obama would say his inability
to oust Assad sent a message that the U.S. and its allies were incapable
of extinguishing growing problems in the region.

"The collapse of the Geneva process on Syria is a serious defeat for
U.S. diplomacy that will not go unnoticed in the region and beyond,"
Melhem predicts.




-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to