[The Congress did right by joining the peoples' movement against the
provisions of the new Land Acquisition Bill at a time when the BJP is
increasingly being seen as pursuing the corporate agenda at the cost
of the marginalised. It is the alienation of the most deprived that
any new political party would have to cash in on -- just as the AAP did
in Delhi. The important lesson to learn for any political party trying
to reinvent itself today is that politics has become decentralised
with new spaces for political activity opening up locally and even
hyper-locally. A new politics needs to occupy these new spaces. This
is the introspection that Mr Gandhi needs to do, not meditation in a
cave.]

I/II.
http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/toi-editorials/extend-your-leave-if-rahul-gandhi-introspects-seriously-on-his-sabbatical-he-will-see-his-own-irrelevance/

Extend your leave: If Rahul Gandhi introspects seriously on his
sabbatical, he will see his own irrelevance
February 25, 2015, 12:08 AM IST TOI Edit in TOI Editorials | Edit Page | TOI

There was a time when Rahul Gandhi was the next great hope of
Congress. It is difficult to remember now but in the initial glow of
his maiden Lok Sabha entry in 2004, the Gandhi scion was hailed as a
youth icon, a fresh agent of change from within and keeper of the
Congress flame. In his early years in the cauldron of politics, people
were willing to give the young dynast time to find his feet.

The trouble is that Rahul's journey of self-discovery is never-ending.
While he keeps struggling to find his centre in politics, the party he
represents continues to vanish. His latest leave of absence from
Congress to "reflect on recent events relating to the party and its
future course" may have been understandable in the immediate
after-shock of the Lok Sabha election debacle. Now, nine months into
the Modi government's tenure and during a crucial budget session that
is divided on the land acquisition bill - one of the few issues Rahul
Gandhi cared to speak about in Parliament - his absence provides more
mirth than answers.
If Rahul introspects seriously on his mysterious sabbatical, he ought
to see his own and his mother's hand behind his party's misfortunes.
Congress lost 9% of national vote share between 2009 and 2014,
declining from 28.6% to 19.3%. Its constant reverses in state assembly
elections and the total wipe-out in Delhi indicates that its crisis is
more than just the normal ebb and flow of political fortunes.

The time has come for Congress to take a call. The All India Congress
Committee will meet in April 2015 and the party's current state of
limbo is unsustainable. Sonia must anoint a successor or call for open
elections in which the family does not take part. Congress held on to
the Gandhis so far because they got votes and prevented the party from
splitting. Their vote-catching aura has clearly dimmed and keeping the
party together may not matter much if it disappears as a political
force. This is why a clear decision is needed. If inner party
elections are held without Rahul then the winner will have legitimacy
and internal democracy will be the cement holding the party together.
Congress needs to act now.

***This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of
The Times of India.*** [Emphasis added.]

II.
http://www.deccanchronicle.com/150226/commentary-columnists/article/what-rahul-needs-big-broom

What Rahul needs is a big broom
DC | Bharat Bhushan | February 26, 2015, 07.02 am IST

Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi
There is speculation that the so-called sabbatical of Rahul Gandhi is
because of petulance at not getting his way in the party. His
differences with his mother and Congress president Sonia Gandhi are
being cited as reasons for the need to "introspect". But it may be too
early to conclude that his differences with her arise from a young
man's impatience to take over as Congress president. For all his
alleged faults, Mr Gandhi does not come across as greedy for power. He
is also intelligent enough to know that his image has taken a more
severe beating than that of the Congress or his mother, and so this
may not be the best time for him to take over.

He must know he still has to earn his spurs by demonstrating his
ability to win elections, his people connect, and his credibility as a
serious politician. There is no denying a marked deficit on each of
these counts in his public persona. However, it does seem that he has
become something of a convenient whipping boy not only of his
political opponents but also of those Congressmen who have got used to
the Gandhi family doing all the running around so that they can enjoy
the fruits of their campaigning.

Surely he alone cannot be blamed for the rout of the Congress, which
began with the Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections in 2012. None of the
young rising stars of Uttar Pradesh, many of whom were ministers in
the Manmohan Singh government, were able to deliver a single Assembly
segment from their respective constituencies. In the Lok Sabha
election, Rahul and Sonia Gandhi won their own seats in Uttar Pradesh
but a Jiten Prasada or an R.P.N. Singh did not. In the Delhi Assembly
election, how fair is it to blame Mr Gandhi for even an experienced
leader like Ajay Maken losing his deposit?

Therefore, while this may not be the right time to elevate him, it may
be an opportune conjuncture for him to experiment within the party. It
is perhaps here that real differences exist between him and Mrs
Gandhi. He wants to radically restructure the party, while his mother
is being advised against drastic changes by those who stand to lose
the most. Mrs Gandhi is surrounded by a clique of bickering advisers
trying to defend their political turf. They have no mass base and are
clever not to contest elections. They never get blamed for electoral
debacles. She listens to them because it is comforting to listen to
old advisers. However, she ought to be listening to those who want to
experiment to survive in a rapidly changing political environment.

This is the right time for the Congress to make changes and send out
two clear messages -- that the party can put together a credible
leadership, and that it is serious about taking up peoples' issues.
There is no major state election in the offing where the Congress
might have a crucial stake and the general election is still far away.
It is possible that a restive electorate may not find the Narendra
Modi government able to deliver soon enough on its electoral promises
and even the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) may find it impossible to sustain
its politics of freebies in Delhi. Time is always on the side of the
challenger. But the Congress will have to show that it has the makings
of a challenger.

Four years ago, with Mrs Gandhi heading abroad for a surgery, she was
forced to experiment with the idea that a collective leadership of
four -- including Mr Gandhi -- would run the Congress. Yet, the party is
not willing to revive that plan now when it is imperative to get rid
of the old parasites and put together a new panel of credible leaders
from the states, who reflect the change taking place in the country.

There is a plethora of issues today that traditional political parties
take no serious cognisance of. Conflicts over common and natural
resources and depletion of livelihoods vary across the vast
geographical and climatic zones of India; the ordinary citizens want
to have a say in decision making and in the implementation of
government plans about their own welfare, including provisions for
quality education and healthcare; tribals and forest dwellers live in
constant fear of being displaced by one big project or the other;
Muslims and Christians are being forced to question their familiar
identities. If there are people who speak for these threatened and
marginalised social groups, they have no voice in politics today.

***The Congress did right by joining the peoples' movement against the
provisions of the new Land Acquisition Bill at a time when the BJP is
increasingly being seen as pursuing the corporate agenda at the cost
of the marginalised. It is the alienation of the most deprived that
any new political party would have to cash in on -- just as the AAP did
in Delhi. The important lesson to learn for any political party trying
to reinvent itself today is that politics has become decentralised
with new spaces for political activity opening up locally and even
hyper-locally. A new politics needs to occupy these new spaces. This
is the introspection that Mr Gandhi needs to do, not meditation in a
cave.*** [Emphasis added.]

Whatever else Mr Modi may or may not have done, he and his party in
their political arrogance have alienated liberal and democratic civil
society groups, trade unions cutting across industry and agriculture,
and non-governmental organisations working with the poor and
marginalised across the country. ***The Congress Party, if it has to
reinvent itself, has to do so by participating in these localised
struggles. It should not aim at taking them over -- but rather join
them because it shares their concerns. A new leadership will emerge
from these movements and some of them will align with like-minded
political groups and parties. The Congress must present itself as one
such choice. For that it needs a "Swachh Congress" campaign.***
[Emphasis added.] Mr Gandhi should be given a big broom to begin that
process.

The writer is a journalist based in New Delhi

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to