I/II.
Opposition rejects Land Bill, dubs government move "pro-corporate"

Monday, 9 March 2015 - 7:15pm IST | Place: New Delhi | Agency: PTI

Opposition in Lok Sabha on Monday tore into the controversial Land
Acquisition Bill, saying its "draconian" and "anti-poor" provisions
would have a deleterious effect on India's food security.

Opposition in Lok Sabha on Monday tore into the controversial Land
Acquisition Bill, saying its "draconian" and "anti-poor" provisions
would have a deleterious effect on India's food security.

The Opposition members, ranging from the Congress and Trinamool
Congress (TMC) to the Left, ***BJD and AIADMK*** e[emphasis added, as
this shows a significant accretion to the Opposition ranks regardless
of the fact that the BJP enjoys absolute majority in the lower house
while it is apparently is in hopeless minority in the upper house],
launched a tirade against the Right to Fair Compensation and
Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement
(Amendment) Bill 2015, which was moved for consideration and passing
by Rural Development Minister Birender Singh.

Several opposition members particularly opposed the NDA government's
move to do away with Section 2 and 3A of the existing land acquisition
law which provided for social impact assessment before land transfer
and safeguarding the interest of farmers.

Participating in the discussion, Jyotiraditya Scindia (Congress) said
the law in its present form would allow private entities to take away
multi-crop land, which will put at stake food security of the people
of the country.

"Is the government trying to reduce this country to an importer of
foodgrains? If this bill gets passed, farmers will give up all
expectations from this country," Scindia said.

Kalyan Banerjee (TMC) accused the government of taking away farmers'
rights and said his government will oppose the Bill "tooth and nail"
to safeguard their interests.

"This government is for the corporates, this government is anti-poor,
anti-farmers and will sell the country to industrialists," Banerjee
said.

Opposing the "draconian" provision, C N Jayadevan (CPI-M) said the
rehabilitation and compensation as provided in the Bill would
adversely affect the interest of farmers. The government has a clear
intention to have a "pro-corporate and anti-farmer" land acquisition
law, he said.

The Land Acquisition Bill, which seeks to replace an Ordinance issued
in December to amend the Land Act 2013, was introduced in the Lok
Sabha on February 24.

Along with the Bill, the House today took up a statutory resolution,
moved by NDA partner Swabhimani Paksha and Opposition parties like
Congress, CPI(M), TMC, RSP and BJD, disapproving it.

The amendments, among other things, seek to exempt social impact
surveys for land acquisition for five purposes including industrial
corridor, rural infrastructure and housing for poor.

As the Minister moved the Bill for consideration, Leader of Congress
Mallikarjun Kharge demanded that he should explain some provisions of
the Bill before a discussion could be initiated. Singh, however, said
he would speak only when he replies to the debate.

During the discussion, K N Ramachandran (AIADMK) dubbed some of the
amendments as "ultra-reformist" and said his party had strong
reservations against exempting land acquisition by private hospitals
and private educational institutions.

Tathagata Satpathy (BJD) said the amendments were detrimental to the
interests of the poor who would lose their land without compensation.

Accusing the government of not discussing with the opposition parties
before going ahead with the amendments to the Land Act, Scindia said
the NDA government's slogan of 'sabka sath, sabka vikas' (support of
all, development for all) has "fallen flat on the face as it was now
ignoring the interest of farmers".

65% of India's population was dependent on agriculture, but the
government is only thinking about the corporates, the Congress leader
said.

Citing earlier instances of several BJP members opposing dilution of
the consent clause and no social impact assessment when the UPA was in
power, Scindia said these members are now doing a "U-turn" and
supporting the amendments to the Bill.

"Through the amendments, you have made the Bill look like a body
ripping it of its flesh and blood," he said, appealing to the members
to vote against the amendments when the Bill comes up for passage
tomorrow.

Under the amended law, the mandatory "consent" clause and Social
Impact Assessment (SIA) will not be applicable if the land is acquired
for five purposes.

The measure to replace the ordinance makes significant changes in the
Land Acquisition Act including removal of consent clause for acquiring
land for five areas -- industrial corridors, PPP projects, rural
infrastructure, affordable housing and defence.

The amendments bring 13 legislations, including those relating to
defence and national security, to provide higher compensation and
rehabilitation and resettlement benefits to farmers whose land is
being acquired, under the Centre's purview.



-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to