http://scroll.in/article/715781/When-Modi-mocks-NREGA,-he-ridicules-the-80-million-Indians-contributing-to-the-nation%E2%80%99s-development

When Modi mocks NREGA, he ridicules the 80 million Indians
contributing to the nation's development

The prime minister feels the scheme is just about digging ditches. He
would do better looking at government statistics and talking to the
country's poor.
Indrajit Roy

Today ยท 08:50 am



Photo Credit: Krishnendu Halder/Reuters

Despite all the inimical noises made by the current government, the
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act has survived.
The budget recently allocated to it by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley
confirms the government is not willing to axe the scheme - at least
not this year. But does that rule out its erosion? Prime Minister
Narendra Modi's repeated denigration of the NREGA as a programme under
which poor people dig ditches mocks the labours of the nearly 80
million people who toil under its aegis. By disparaging the scheme, he
also ridicules his own government's data.

NREGA's official website reveals that over 45% of all works taken up
under the scheme entailed provision of rural sanitation. Construction
of irrigation facilities for Dalit, adivasi and other impoverished
farmers comprised 13% of the works, while land development works on
the farms of poor landowners made up 9% of the total. Rural
connectivity works made up a further 11%, while the creation of water
conservation and water harvesting structures (presumably what the
prime minister had in mind when he spoke of digging ditches) comprised
7%.

[Chart]

This is what the official data says. Voices from the ground equally
rebut the prime minister.

If Modi had met the sarpanchs in his home state, he would have
appreciated the programme's value to them. In Gujarat's Veraval
district, the sarpanch of Malondha Gram Panchayat told me about the
culverts constructed by workers using NREGA funds. Neither he nor the
NREGA workers thought that the programme was a waste, as the epithet
of digging ditches implies.

Likewise, in Bihar, NREGA workers always refer to themselves as
labourers, majdoors, whose hard work is developing India. "Majdoor ke
paseena sookhne se pehle usko majdoori milni chahiye (A labourer
should get his wage before his sweat dries)," Kulanand Mandal told me
outside his mud hut in Bihar's Araria block. In neighbouring Bhargama
Gram Panchayat's Ward 1, Sapuri Rishi toils on an afforestation
project on a plot of land owned by a family living "below the poverty
line". Like Kulanand Mandal, he insisted that he is a labourer whose
sweat and industry contributes to India's development.

Leading dignified lives

The prime minister's mocking comments reflect the attitude of his
voluble supporters among the middle classes and elites who think the
scheme a waste. Their outlooks could not be more removed from reality
and the perceptions of NREGA workers.

It is rare for individuals to work for more than 23 days a year on
average under the NREGA (the average per household is 46). For most of
the rest of the year, they earn a living elsewhere - in agricultural
labour, on construction sites or brick kilns, as loaders carrying
weights of up to 25 kilograms from trucks and trains, as vendors of
vegetables and trinkets or garbage collectors in urban areas.

As far as the workers are concerned, the few days they labour under
the NREGA is more productive than any of the other streams of work
they engage in.

Moreover, the scheme offers a great additional gain: it strips away
labourers' dependence on farmers, allowing them to lead dignified
lives in villages. For workers, this is a treasured independence
despite the frequent delays in NREGA wage payments. It lets them
bargain with farmers for higher agricultural wages.

It is true that labourers' claims sometimes threaten farmers,
especially the poorer ones who face high input costs, and such farmers
are unable to meet the demands for higher wages. But recognising these
constraints, many panchayats across India have utilised NREGA budgets
to improve land and irrigation facilities owned by small and marginal
farmers, the ones most threatened by cutbacks in agricultural
subsidies as well as increased demands for labour. As the graphic
shows, over 20% of all works under the NREGA pertain to such
improvement works that benefit both agricultural labourers as well as
poor farmers. Does this win-win situation not appeal to the prime
minister?

It certainly does to his party's chief ministers. In Chhattisgarh, a
state governed by the Bharatiya Janata Party since 2003, nearly 60% of
all NREGA activity relates to improvement works and land development
that support agricultural labourers and poor farmers. Likewise, in
Madhya Pradesh, another state governed by the BJP since 2003, nearly
40% of all NREGA works are of similar nature.

Thread of continuity

There was a thread of continuity in Modi's derisory comments, which
reflected the attitude adopted by the Congress party. While
inaugurating the NREGA in 2005, the Congress gifted to it the awkward
term wageseeker, implying that NREGA workers were beneficiaries, or
labharti in Hindi. Such a view blinds the politicians of the two
parties to the value that the assets created under the programme hold
for the inhabitants of the nearly 250,000 gram panchayats in the
country.

Jaitley's budget makes remarkable promises about increasing rural
credit and furthering off-farm opportunities in rural areas. These
promises are to be welcomed. Whatever be the provenance of the
programme, to say that it will be a memorial to the Congress's
failures stigmatises the hard work of NREGA labourers. The prime
minister is free to score brownie points over his political
adversaries. But, in doing so, must he denigrate the contribution of
NREGA workers to India's development?

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to