I/III.
http://www.ibnlive.com/news/politics/bjp-selling-tickets-to-criminals-to-contest-bihar-elections-alleges-party-mp-rk-singh-1114032.html

BJP selling tickets to criminals to contest Bihar elections, alleges
party MP RK Singh
Posted on: 11:21 AM IST Sep 26, 2015 IST

CNN-IBN

With Bihar elections around the corner, problems are emerging within
the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) over ticket distribution. Party MP
from Arrah in Bihar RK Singh has slammed the party leadership accusing
it of issuing tickets to known criminals.

"Popular sitting MLAs are denied tickets and criminals are being given
tickets. No wonder party workers are enraged," Singh asserted.

Singh also said that he tried to speak to the BJP leadership over the
issue as they are not doing justice with the public.

Singh has said that the party is weakening its position in Bihar by
playing dirty politics. He also highlighted that the BJP has attacked
the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD)-Janata Dal United (JDU) for 'jungle
raj' in Bihar but by giving tickets to known criminals, it is
projecting itself as no different from the Nitish Kumar-Lalu Prasad
combine.

"They are giving tickets to the criminals. If they are giving tickets
to criminal, what difference will remain between Lalu and BJP," he
said.

Singh also said that he tried to speak to the BJP leadership over the
issue. "I tried to call Sushil Modi on this. They are not doing
justice with the public. They should make clear why the ticket was
given to criminals," he added.

II/III.
http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/bihar-elections-bjp-denies-r-k-singhs-allegations-of-corruption-in-seat-distribution/

Bihar elections: BJP denies R K Singh’s allegations of corruption in
seat distribution
By: ANI | New Delhi | September 26, 2015 1:41 pm

R K Singh alleged that the distribution of seats in the forthcoming
Bihar assembly elections was done on the basis of money.

Refuting former home secretary R K Singh’s allegation that the
distribution of seats in the forthcoming state assembly elections in
Bihar was done on the basis of money, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
leader Siddharth Nath Singh on Saturday said that candidates were
selected democratically by the central election committee and the
parliamentary board.

The BJP leader said that the former bureaucrat’s views were his own,
and that the party could not be held accountable for it.

“It could be an individual viewipoint, but certainly, there is a
process which is a very democratic process in the party, through the
central election committee and the parliamentary board. They come
together and they decide on the ticket distribution. So, therefore,
nobody should be raising questions on the decisions of the central
election committee,” Singh said.

“My request goes to all BJP leaders in Bihar that please focus on
ensuring that there is no jungle raj part 2 and we all together will
fight and defeat the opposing alliance, and at the same time, one
should also practice restraint,” he added.

A similar comment came from another BJP leader Nalin Kohli, who said,
“We don’t agree with the comment of R.K. Singh, and it is a personal
comment. It doesn’t reflect the working style of the party.”

Kohli also said that the BJP was not a party which runs on a single
family or individuals.

“Anyone who seeks to join the BJP, they only join it because they know
it runs on an ideology and democratic system,” he added.

Meanwhile, Bihar BJP leader C.P. Thakur also rejected the claim of
R.K. Singh and said, “The party president has taken a lot of
consideration before the allotment of the seats. Few seats were given
to all allies and the BJP had no role in it. There is nothing wrong
with the procedure,” Thakur added.

R K Singh on Saturday criticised the Bihar unit of the BJP while
expressing his dissatisfaction over seat sharing in the state before
the assembly polls. He said money was taken for distribution of
tickets for the forthcoming elections. Singh accused the party of
neglecting sitting MLAs and giving tickets to criminals.

Polls in Bihar will take place from October 12 to November 5. The
counting of votes will take place on November 8. The tenure of the
current assembly expires on November 29.

III.
http://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/column-owaisi-s-unreal-project-2128481

Bihar Polls: Asaduddin Owaisi’s unreal project

Friday, 25 September 2015 - 8:00am IST | Place: Mumbai | Agency: dna    |
>From the print edition
Soroor Ahmed

A Dalit-Muslim coalition for Bihar polls may prove to be extremely
difficult for AIMIM

The All India Majlis-e-Ittehad-ul-Muslimeen (AIMIM) chief Asaduddin
Owaisi, who has been known to describe Ambedkar as a leader greater
than Mahatma Gandhi, recently claimed that like in Telangana and
Maharashtra, his party is launching similar efforts to form an
alliance of Dalits and Muslims in poll-bound Bihar.

Owaisi’s electoral project throws up the pertinent question whether
Bihar indeed has any space for such a socio-political coalition of
Muslims and Dalits. Remember that the Dalits of Bihar, unlike in the
case of Uttar Pradesh, have never reposed full faith in any leader
from their own community. Not even in the former deputy prime
minister, Jagjivan Ram, the youngest minister in the first Jawaharlal
Nehru cabinet. Ram failed to emerge as a mass Dalit leader in his home
state, Bihar, during the heyday of the Congress when Scheduled Castes
tended to blindly vote for the Grand Old Party. For nearly three and a
half decades, Jagjivan Ram held various important portfolios; yet he
could hardly advance Dalit politics after Independence. Many political
observers believed that Ram was inducted in the cabinet by the first
Prime Minister only to serve as a counter-point to Ambedkar.

After the decline of the Congress, Dalit votes in Bihar gradually
started disintegrating. Though in the early 1990s, Lalu Prasad and
Nitish Kumar in their early years did succeed in attracting a sizeable
section of Dalits to their fold. The Left parties, especially the
CPI(ML), also managed to carve out their own votebank among Dalits. It
may be conjectured that Lalu and Nitish could initially register some
impact on this community only because they could work for them as
heads of state. In contrast, Ram Vilas Paswan, who never made it to
the chief minister’s post, was driven into joining hands with other
parties to survive politically.

In such a situation, can Majlis successfully woo Bihar’s Dalits who,
up till now, have not responded to such rallying calls issued even by
veteran Dalit leaders like Kanshi Ram and Mayawati? Apart from Ravidas
or cobblers –– who, unlike in UP, do not constitute such a sizeable
community in Bihar, none of the other Dalit sub-castes have leaned
towards the Bahujan Samaj Party in Bihar. Mayawati and Kanshi Ram did
succeed in emerging as Dalit leaders in Uttar Pradesh, even though
they were not born in that state. Kanshi Ram was born in Punjab’s
Ropar and Mayawati in New Delhi. Both made Uttar Pradesh their
‘karambhoomi’ — site of work — in 1983.

In contrast, apart from paying lip-service, the Majlis, during the
long 87-years of its existence, has failed to reach out to Dalits even
in Owaisi’s home turf of Telangana. Neither has the organisation been
able to mark its presence in Maharashtra, the state famous for the
Dalit movement since the time of Ambedkar. In last October’s assembly
election, the Majlis put up candidates in Muslim-dominated pockets of
Maharashtra, especially in the region which was part of the erstwhile
Nizam state, but it bypassed Vidarbha despite its sizeable Dalit
population. Vidarbha is the site where, in 1956, thousands of Dalits
converted to Buddhism under the leadership of Ambedkar. Consider that
the Majlis has seven MLAs in Telangana and two in Maharashtra. But not
a single one of them is Dalit; nor is there any Dalit representation
in the Majlis leadership.

Why then would Dalits respond to Owaisi’s call in Bihar, especially
when Lok Janshakti Party (LJP), the outfit led by the tallest Dalit
leader of the state, Ram Vilas Paswan, managed to secure only 6.4 per
cent votes in last year’s Lok Sabha election. Remember that the LJP
contested the elections in an alliance with the Bharatiya Janata Party
and Rashtriya Lok Samata Party in Bihar. That it could win six out of
the seven parliamentary seats it contested in 2014 was largely because
more BJP votes got transferred to the LJP and not the other way round.

Let’s now consider some hard statistics. In Bihar, Scheduled Castes
constitute 15.72% of the population. The largest Dalit party, the LJP
in the last Lok Sabha polls could not get even half of this percentage
of votes. Not to mention that then LJP was riding the Narendra Modi
wave. According to a post-poll study, 68 per cent of Dussadhs or
Paswans, the caste Ram Vilas Paswan belongs to, had voted for the
National Democratic Alliance in 2014. At around 4% of the population,
the Paswans happen to be numerically, socially, educationally as well
as economically, the strongest of the 22 Dalit castes.

Given that the LJP has more often than not contested elections in
alliance with different parties, it’s difficult to assess the party’s
independent electoral strength. Yet it can be said that Paswan, the
LJP leader, can at best be considered the undisputed leader of
Dussadhs, and not the entire Dalit community of Bihar.

Without any representation in the Bihar assembly, the LJP remains a
minor player in the state’s electoral politics despite Bihar’s large
Dalit population. The reason why the BJP this time has allotted a
chunk of 41 seats to the LJP is because Dussadhs, known for their
political aggression, could become an expedient electoral constituency
in countering Yadavs in their strongholds.

It’s important to remember that the political capability of another
Dalit leader Jitan Ram Manjhi has not yet been tested. Not appearing
to be too confident of Manjhi, the BJP has left just 20 seats for his
outfit, the Hindustani Awam Morcha. The truth is that Manjhi was never
really considered to be a Dalit leader till he became the Chief
Minister, thanks to Nitish Kumar. Out of the 15 legislators — 13 MLAs
and two MLCs — who have aligned with Manjhi, only one is a Dalit.

If such well-known Dalit faces have electorally failed in Bihar to
make a real difference, how can Majlis — with no base whatsoever even
among Muslims — dream of successfully wooing them?

Besides, Dalit politics is riddled with contradictions. Ram Vilas
Paswan has prevented Mayawati from encroaching on his support base.
Now he is not letting Manjhi, who represents Mushahars, the most
backward of all Dalit castes, advance politically. Thus Owaisi’s
somewhat unreal idea of forging an electorally effective Dalit-Muslim
alliance can at best be described as a pipedream.

The author is a senior journalist
-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to