http://scroll.in/article/810807/the-nine-year-curse-why-bjp-policies-are-leading-india-towards-a-2020-disaster

ANYTHING THAT MOVES

The Nine-Year Curse: Why BJP policies are leading India towards a 2020 disaster

A somnolent reform programme combined with a hyperactive communal
agenda spell trouble for the nation.

6 hours ago

Girish Shahane

The most disheartening aspect of Arnab Goswami’s interview with
Narendra Modi was not the soft questions, nor the lack of probing
follow-ups, for I expected no better from Goswami. It was the
inability of the prime minister to produce a cogent defence of his
government’s policies or a persuasive sketch of its achievements.

If you bowl a series of waist-high full tosses to a striker and he
fails to smack a single one to the boundary, his ability as a batsman
must be called into question. Since Modi’s communication skills are
well established, the absurdly high platitude quotient in his
responses (the world has changed, blah blah, interdependence yadayada)
can only be explained by his having nothing substantive to project.
Seeking a few grains in the chaff, the media highlighted his defence
of Raghuram Rajan, though it had arrived with all the alacrity of the
Gujarat police’s riot response in 2002.

The Modi government’s motto seems to be to aim low and claim high.
Instead of keeping up the pressure for a permanent United Nations
Security Council seat, it made a lot of noise about entry to the
Nuclear Suppliers’ Group, which would have provided meagre benefits.
In the event, the canny Eleven Xinping thwarted even that tiny
victory. What use those visas denied to Chinese dissidents?

Or take the new civil aviation policy proclaimed a “game changer” by
the minister Ashok Gajapathi Raju. It tweaked the criteria for
airlines to fly abroad and introduced dubious price controls and cross
subsidies, while completely ignoring the white elephant named Air
India squatting on the minister’s desk. Hey, oil prices are low, let’s
kick the can forward on fundamental problems and hype minor
adjustments.

The path to power

Modi was elected on three promises: overhauling the mechanisms of
governance, reshaping the economy, and promoting the majority
religion. While the Bharatiya Janata Party's reform programme
resembles railway minister Suresh Prabhu nodding off while performing
an asana on Yoga Day, its communal plan is like the hairy Baba Ramdev
(a man who can’t cure his own strabismus but promises to heal other
peoples’ cancers) enthusiastically performing jumping jacks on stage
the same day, no doubt exactly as Patanjali did 5,000 years ago, or
maybe ten.

The BJP’s cosmopolitan supporters downplayed the religious aspect of
its election rhetoric as a mere propaganda tool unconnected with its
pragmatic goals, but now the reverse appears more accurate. The
party’s promise of economic and political reform was disinformation
designed to woo mainstream media and influential liberal commentators,
while its deep commitment was to Hindutva as it always has been.

>From appointing patently unqualified acolytes as heads of renowned
institutions, to changing school text books to reflect its sectarian
vision of history, to engendering conflicts using the holy cow as
proxy, the party’s enthusiasm in exploiting wedge issues contrasts
glaringly with its timidity in reform. The imbalance is bound to grow
as citizens more attuned to their lived experience than massaged GDP
growth figures become disenchanted with the regime. I fear it could
spiral into the worst iteration of the nine-year curse to date.

Let me describe the curse. The Indian economy and polity appear to run
in nine-year cycles, reaching a crisis point at the end of each
period. An inflammable mix of falling growth, high unemployment and
social tensions lead to an outbreak of violence on a large scale every
nine years, with one region of the nation often becoming a focal point
of tension, and a minority community bearing the brunt of the pain.

Looking back

The year 1965-'66 had many of the elements needed for the curse to
take effect, with India reeling under food shortages and a recession,
but perhaps the India-Pakistan war served as a counter balance to
internal tensions. In 1974-'75, we were less lucky. A civil
disobedience movement led by Jayaprakash Narayan undermined Indira
Gandhi’s rule, and she responded by clamping down on civil liberties
and unleashing the worst attack on individual liberties in India’s
independent history. Her younger son Sanjay Gandhi, the most
unsuitable and unqualified person ever to wield great power in India,
a man openly contemptuous of democracy and democratic institutions,
launched a dreadfully misguided family planning programme that
targeted poor people and Muslims for forced sterilisation.

In 1983 and 1984, sectarian violence and terrorism gripped Assam and
Punjab. It climaxed with Indira Gandhi’s assassination and a pogrom
against Sikhs in Delhi. Nine years later, militant Hindu anger fixated
on the Babri Masjid. In the wake of the mosque’s demolition, violence
broke out in many parts of the country. The most explosive bout of
rioting occurred in early 1993 in Bombay, with Muslims the targets and
members of the local chauvinist party, the Shiv Sena, the main
perpetrators.

Nine years later, Narendra Modi’s Gujarat became the laboratory of
militant Hindutva and Muslims again faced Hindu wrath, condoned and
probably channelised by state machinery. In 2010, anger at the ruling
Congress party’s corruption, exemplified by the hash it made in
preparing for the Commonwealth Games, fed a new civil disobedience
movement headed by Anna Hazare, which took hold of Delhi the following
year.

If we didn’t see the same kind of violence that we had in previous
decades, it was partly because of the largely Gandhian nature of the
anti-corruption movement, partly because Manmohan Singh and Sonia
Gandhi, a more sensible pair than Indira and Sanjay Gandhi, handled
the protesters with kid gloves, and partly because India had enjoyed
eight years of unprecedented economic growth and dropping poverty
levels.

Next round

The curse is due to return in 2019-'20. Should Modi’s Make in India
campaign become something more than the empty slogan it currently is,
we might stave off its worst effects as we did in 2011, but a brief
glance at the world around us should keep us from complacency. We
often speak of India as two nations, but the rise of Donald Trump and
the Brexit election indicate that the US and England also have two
nations in their midst. The uneven development spurred by
globalisation is obviously a greater threat than ever. The Patel and
Jat riots of the past year provide a foretaste of what might come if
the Modi government continues to cut social programmes and
unemployment keeps rising.

One country seemed to have squared the circle by embracing the
opportunities of globalisation while also creating an increasingly
equitable society, and that was Brazil five years ago. Its newly
elected President Dilma Rousseff was an inspirational figure who had
survived torture by security forces during the dictatorship. With the
FIFA World Cup and Olympics to look forward to, Brazil was the envy of
the developing world. Then everything went horribly wrong, the economy
fell into recession, Rousseff was impeached, and her administration
replaced by a bunch of reactionaries, many of whom face corruption
charges. Add the Zika scare to the mix and you have a picture of
Brazil today almost unimaginable five years ago.

I hope we don’t see a downturn of Brazilian proportions. Our economies
are very different and good arguments can be made that India is on
very stable ground. On the other hand, how many people predicted the
meltdown of 2008? How many surprises and shocks elsewhere in the world
will it take for us to believe it could happen to us? In states like
Uttar Pradesh, Sangh Parivar activists are infecting every village and
small town with the virus of hatred.

As the next election approaches, Narendra Modi might find he cannot
win on a positive platform of development, governmental reform and
anti-corruption. He will be left with one dangerous weapon, and if he
and his troops wield it effectively we could face a communal
conflagration that dwarfs 2002, 1993, and 1984.

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to