[“Government, on 7th November, 2016, advised the Reserve Bank that to
mitigate the triple problems of counterfeiting, terrorist financing
and black money, the Central Board of the Reserve Bank may consider
withdrawal of the legal tender status of the notes in high
denominations of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000,” said the RBI in a seven-page
note submitted on December 22 to the Parliament’s Department Related
Committee of Finance headed by Congress leader M Veerappa Moily.
...
“Reserve Bank ke Board ne yah nirnay liya. Isko Sarkar ke paas bheja
aur sarkar ne is nirnay ki sarahna karte hue, cabinet ne ise manjoori
di ki paanch sau or hazar ke purane noton ko radd kiya jaaye, naye
notes aaye (The Board of Reserve Bank took this decision, sent it
before the government and with the government endorsing it, Cabinet
gave its nod to it to demonetise the old currency notes of Rs 500 and
Rs 1000 and bring new notes),” [Union Minister Piyush] Goyal had said
[in the Rajya Sabha, on November 16 2016].]

http://indianexpress.com/article/business/economy/demonetisation-on-november-7-it-was-govt-which-advised-rbi-to-consider-note-ban-got-rbi-nod-the-next-day-rajya-sabha-4467235/

Demonetisation: On Nov 7, it was Govt which ‘advised’ RBI to
‘consider’ note ban, got RBI nod next day
That’s what RBI says in 7-page note to House panel; agrees with Govt’s
rationale to counter ‘FICN menace’.

Written by Anand Mishra | New Delhi | Updated: January 10, 2017

There have been widespread reports of the usage of Fake Indian
Currency Notes (FICN) for financing of terrorism and drug financing.
(Representational image)

SO far, the Government has suggested that the decision to withdraw
500-rupee and 1,000-rupee notes came from the Reserve Bank of India.
But in its submission to a Parliamentary panel late last month, the
RBI, agreeing with the Government’s rationale behind the move, has
made it clear that it was the Government which “advised” it to do so.

***“Government, on 7th November, 2016, advised the Reserve Bank that
to mitigate the triple problems of counterfeiting, terrorist financing
and black money, the Central Board of the Reserve Bank may consider
withdrawal of the legal tender status of the notes in high
denominations of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000,” said the RBI in a seven-page
note submitted on December 22 to the Parliament’s Department Related
Committee of Finance headed by Congress leader M Veerappa Moily.***
[Emphasis added.]

“It was advised in that letter that cash has been a facilitator of
black money,” the note went on to state, “elimination of black money
will eliminate the long shadow of the ghost economy and will be
positive for India’s growth outlook. They also observed that in the
last five years, there has been an increase in circulation of Rs 500
and Rs 1,000 notes with an increasing incidence of counterfeiting of
these notes.

There have been widespread reports of the usage of Fake Indian
Currency Notes (FICN) for financing of terrorism and drug financing.

The FICN have their origin in neighbouring country and pose a grievous
threat to the security and integrity of the country. Hence the
Government has recommended that the withdrawal of the legal tender
character of these notes is apposite. GoI advised the Bank to place
these matters of immediacy before the Directors of the Central Board
of the Reserve Bank of India for consideration…” the note said.

According to RBI’s note, accessed by The Indian Express, the RBI
Central Board met the very next day to “consider the Government’s
advice,” and after “deliberations,” decided to recommend to Central
Government that the legal tender status of the banknotes in the high
denominations of Rs 500 and Rs 1000 be withdrawn.” The Government
“considered the recommendations” and decided to withdraw the notes.
That same evening, Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the nation
and announced the decision to withdraw the notes effective midnight
November 8.

Eight days later, during a debate on demonetisation in the Rajya
Sabha, Union Minister for Power, Coal, New and Renewable Energy Piyush
Goyal said that the decision to demonetise was taken by the RBI Board.

“Reserve Bank ke Board ne yah nirnay liya. Isko Sarkar ke paas bheja
aur sarkar ne is nirnay ki sarahna karte hue, cabinet ne ise manjoori
di ki paanch sau or hazar ke purane noton ko radd kiya jaaye, naye
notes aaye (The Board of Reserve Bank took this decision, sent it
before the government and with the government endorsing it, Cabinet
gave its nod to it to demonetise the old currency notes of Rs 500 and
Rs 1000 and bring new notes),” Goyal had said.

In its note, the RBI, under the heading “Background” and
“Preparations,” said: “It occurred to Government of India and the
Reserve Bank that the introduction of new series of notes could
provide a very rare and profound opportunity to tackle all the three
problems of counterfeiting, terrorist financing and black money by
demonetising the banknotes in high denominations of Rs 500 and Rs 1000
or by withdrawing legal tender status of such banknotes…Though no firm
decision was taken initially, whether to demonetise or not,
preparations still went on for introduction of new series notes, as
that was needed in any case.”

The RBI recalled that as early as October 7, 2014, it had suggested to
the Government the need for introduction of higher denomination notes
of value Rs 5,000 and Rs 10,000, keeping in view inflation and the
need for “facilitating payments and managing the currency logistics.”

The Government considered the same and after deliberations, advised on
May 18, 2016 their “in-principle decision” to introduce Rs 2000-notes.

Accordingly, the RBI, on May 27, 2016, recommended to Government that
a new series of bank notes with new designs, sizes, colours and themes
including notes in the new Rs 2,000 denomination be introduced. The
Government gave their final approval on June 7, 2016 and, accordingly,
the presses were advised in June 2016 to initiate production of new
series notes.

The RBI said that when the stock of new notes printed was reaching a
“critical minimum,” the decision to withdraw the legal tender could be
made. However, the RBI’s own data in the note shows that as of
November 8, 2016 — when the PM announced the decision — the stock of
Rs 2000 notes at the RBI and currency chests was only Rs 94,660 crore,
barely six per cent of the total value of Rs 15 lakh crore withdrawn
with the demonetisation decision.

Yet, the RBI records in its note that the proposal couldn’t have “come
at a more opportune time than coinciding with the introduction of the
new series of notes.”

Justifying its Board’s decision to agree with the Government, the RBI
note says that over the last few years, in consultation with the
Government, the central bank has been working on introduction of new
series of banknotes. It included improving existing security features,
adding new design features to “secure our banknotes against
counterfeiting.” In parallel, the note said, the Government of India
had been taking several steps to curb black money and combat
terrorism.

The panel headed by Moily meets again on January 18 when RBI Governor
Urjit Patel, representatives of the Ministry of Finance, Department of
Economic Affairs, Financial Services and Revenue and representatives
of Indian Banks Association (IBA), State Bank of India (SBI), Punjab
National Bank (PNB) and Oriental Bank of Commerce (OBC) have been
called to depose for a briefing on the subject “Demonetisation of
Indian Currency notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1000 and the impact thereof”.

In the note to the panel, the RBI also said that it was considered
that action as proposed by Government would “result in
non-availability of these denominations” for the public for
transaction and store of value purposes and it “might not immediately
be possible to replace these notes fully in terms of both value and
volume” on one to one basis, within a specific time.

The RBI, however, claimed that the stock of Rs-2000 notes were
arriving in RBI offices and were being despatched to currency chests
across the country and that “could enable” meeting a significant
“critical portion” of the physical demand therefrom in value terms.
“Besides, electronic means of transaction were expected to take
another part of the transaction load hitherto met from physical
currency.

Further, the available stock of other denominations at RBI and
currency chests would also help meet demand. Further, Rs 500 banknotes
in…(New)Series was also being introduced. With these measures in
place, it was considered that the transition from old series to new
series in the context of withdrawal of legal tender character of Rs
500 and Rs 1000 could be managed.”



-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to