[Last week in New York, the first concrete step was taken to implement
December's overwhelming vote in the U.N. General Assembly to negotiate
a new treaty to ban nuclear weapons. Attended by over 100 nations, the
meeting was to decide how the negotiating conference would work when
it gets down to business in late March.]
http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/2017/02/459836.html​

17:13 21 February 2017

OPINION: A moment of truth arrives for a nuclear weapons ban
By Tilman Ruff
MELBOURNE, Feb. 21, Kyodo

***Last week in New York, the first concrete step was taken to
implement December's overwhelming vote in the U.N. General Assembly to
negotiate a new treaty to ban nuclear weapons. Attended by over 100
nations, the meeting was to decide how the negotiating conference
would work when it gets down to business in late March.*** [Emphasis
added.]

China and India were the only nuclear-armed states to attend. Among
the nuclear-allied states, Netherlands, the only NATO state to abstain
rather than vote against the U.N. resolution, was there. Australia,
Japan and South Korea, claiming "protection" from U.S. nuclear
weapons, shamefully opposed the ban resolution and were absent. A more
flagrant way to dishonor hibakusha and Australian nuclear test
survivors is hard to imagine. Despite their rhetoric of wanting
disarmament, these states now stand exposed in their inconsistency,
languishing on the wrong side of history, indelibly stained by their
subservience, even to the dysfunctional and dangerous Trump
administration.

Ambassador Elayne Whyte of Costa Rica was confirmed as the conference
president. Surprisingly, much of the discussion was about the
participation of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), which is
clearly specified in the enabling resolution.

Iran and Syria sought to dilute "participation" to "attendance,"
harden the ability of an NGO to be excluded if a single state objects
to their participation, and allow states to keep their reasons for
objecting confidential. Thankfully, most governments supported the
Irish view that "We would not have reached this point without the
support and advocacy of our civil society partners," and welcoming
"their full and active engagement with us." NGOs will have speaking
rights, albeit limited, and be able to submit papers.

It is ironic that immediately after confirming that civil society
could participate, the meeting was closed to NGOs. It is likely that
much of the closed discussion on rules of procedure revolved around
ban treaty opponents seeking to reduce the capacity of the conference,
if consensus cannot be achieved, to make decisions by majority vote,
as specified in the General Assembly rules which apply. Crucial
aspects of this conference are that no state has a veto (unlike in the
Security Council), and that consensus while desirable is not required.
The need for consensus has completely paralyzed the U.N. Conference on
Disarmament, unable to agree even on an agenda for 21 years.

These negotiations are of historic importance, the most promising
development in nuclear disarmament since the end of the Cold War. They
are in fact the only current disarmament initiative with any
foreseeable chance of success. The ban treaty is a seismic political
shift, with states which do not have or rely on nuclear weapons taking
the lead. A treaty banning nuclear weapons will be concluded by a
large global majority, whether nuclear-armed and nuclear-reliant
states like it or not. And it will change the game in disarmament.

The time of endless empty words about disarmament is over; the moment
of truth has come. Governments serious about a world freed from
nuclear weapons will stand up to be counted in the room for these
negotiations. Nuclear-dependent countries like Japan and Australia are
not there because, for now, they are a part of the existential problem
of nuclear weapons, not the solution. It's past time we changed that.

(Tilman Ruff is co-president of International Physicians for the
Prevention of Nuclear War and founding chair of the International
Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons.)

==Kyodo


-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to