[The Army General's words should not have been uttered. But now that
they have, they should serve as a warning to New Delhi. They reveal
the desperation of the situation in Kashmir, which is beyond any
military solution. A vicious cycle of abuse deepens the alienation of
the people that finds angry expressions against the security forces,
the visible organs of the government. With every passing day and every
shocking phase of repression, the battered people are finding more
vitriolic and violent language to express their anger. For years,
successive governments have abdicated their responsibility by refusing
to meaningfully engage in talks with the alienated sections of the
valley and rest of Jammu and Kashmir.]

http://www.kashmirtimes.in/newsdet.aspx?q=63741

Editorial
MARGINALIA

Decoding the General's belligerence
By Anuradha Bhasin Jamwal
        
General Bipin Rawat's outburst against Kashmir's protesting crowds is
anything but sane. The government's attempt to grant legitimacy to his
words in the name of 'nationalism' reflects a shoddy bias. Forget all
emotiveness over these words, it is important to decode the message
and its possible impact. The immediate inference that can be drawn
from his deliberate or clumsy choice of words is that they are
provocative. The other is that they are an open admission that Kashmir
can no longer be handled militarily.

"We would now request the local population that people who have picked
up arms, and they are the local boys, if they want to continue with
these acts of terrorism, displaying flags of ISIS (Islamic State) and
Pakistan, then we will treat them as anti-national elements and go
helter-skelter for them," the Army chief said, vowing to go in for
"harsher action" against the local population. The Army chief's
strategic concerns are not entirely misplaced. Protests by locals
during crackdowns and encounters against militants prevent military's
combat operations and often result in higher casualties or allow
militants to escape. However, much as an emotion driven Rawat would
wish to prove, there is no way to ascertain whether this is being done
by design or is much of it just a coincidental expression of anger and
frustration. Instead of patting the army chief on the back for his
rash remarks, it would serve the government, if not the army chief, to
decode why people come out in protests at the very sight of security
forces, encounters or no encounters. Why is it that women raise
slogans, youth pick up stones at the very sight of security men? Why
are Pakistani and ISIS flags waved? And, why do people sympathise with
militants, if they do? At the heart of these actions lies long pent up
anger and frustration of the public, anger which is stimulated and
exacerbated by gross violation of human rights.

The flaw of the remarks is primarily in the potential of the words to
obliterate all difference between gun wielding militants and unarmed
civilians, whether they are sympathizers or even supporters. And,
surely, a handful of flags are not deemed to be as much of a strategic
threat as militants lobbing grenades or engaging with security
personnel in encounters. The difficult job of the army and other
security forces in an area where much of the population is hostile to
them is understandable. But the head of an armed force is expected to
be guided by greater sanity and wisdom. Let one not forget that in a
conflict ridden Valley, mere words can be lethal, provoke sentiments
and encourage security personnel already emboldened by an existing
pattern of complete impunity to keep the graph of killings and torture
abnormally high. In a political discourse driven by rabid elements
where even mere criticism of the government on issues like climate and
demonetization can be qualified as 'anti-national', it is anybody's
guess how an entire Valley's population, branded genetically
anti-national will be dealt with. The Valley has a deep dark history
of abuse, perpetuated with support of extra-constitutional laws like
AFSPA, PSA and other mechanisms of institutional impunity. It should
thus not come as surprise why pockets of hostility against the
security forces are increasing and erupting in places where army by
and large had cordial relations with the local population. The echoes
of what security forces have heard in Kulgam, Bandipora and Handwara
in the last one week may easily be found today across much of rural
landscape of Kashmir, still reeling under the after effects of the
shocking killings, pellet injuries, crackdowns and random arrests
during the summer of 2016.

***The Army General's words should not have been uttered. But now that
they have, they should serve as a warning to New Delhi. They reveal
the desperation of the situation in Kashmir, which is beyond any
military solution. A vicious cycle of abuse deepens the alienation of
the people that finds angry expressions against the security forces,
the visible organs of the government. With every passing day and every
shocking phase of repression, the battered people are finding more
vitriolic and violent language to express their anger. For years,
successive governments have abdicated their responsibility by refusing
to meaningfully engage in talks with the alienated sections of the
valley and rest of Jammu and Kashmir.*** [Emphasis added.] While
previous governments in the past have begun initiatives of direct or
track two engagements, the present government appears to have left
even the business of the engaging with youth groups and wooing them
over with sops to the army and other security forces. The political
dispensation, thus, is doing not only a disservice to Kashmiris but
also to the Army and other security forces. While there can be no
perfect way to start a process of dialogue, by leaving every
politically born mess for the security forces to sort out, the
government is treading on a dangerous path.

An, oft posed question is how does one start a dialogue. The answer
is: It can begin anywhere, even at a very small level - by making an
entry point through civil society initiatives and reaching out to
groups who are trying to negotiate with the challenging conflict in
innovative and creative ways, making an unconditional offer of
dialogue with separatists or by announcing meaningful confidence
building measures like measures to address human rights violations and
failed justice mechanisms in Kashmir. Another way of beginning
channels of dialogue can be a process of engagement between New Delhi
and Islamabad. The Pakistan involvement and role cannot be wished
away. It is in the best interests of Pakistan also to understand that
it will be creating a bigger mess for itself by trying to remote
control events in Kashmir through propaganda or by activating its
agencies in the name of 'moral support'. Pakistan needs to first prove
its own consistency with respect to Kashmir. Whichever way, New Delhi
chooses to initiate a dialogue, for best results, India and Pakistan
must stop playing the mind games and put on hold their propaganda and
hatred spinning machineries.


News Updated at : Sunday, February 19, 2017


-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to