It is actually a wee bit difficult to comprehend US legislative conduct exclusively in terms of the Indian experience - using it as the universal yardstick.
For one, while in India, an elected memeber of a legislative body loses her/his membership in case s/he is found the violated the party whip in the house. It just doesn't apply in case of the US (and so many other democracies). Two, as regards the "commonsensical" understanding, in terms of Indian experience, that all members of a party in a legislative body will act in unison - following the diktats issued by the "leader", regardless of the provision for "disqualification", often does not hold. A very recent, and highly visible, example is Trunp's continued difficulty in getting the "Obamacare" repealed despite this being a major poll promise, despite his persistent and intense efforts, despite both the House of Representatives and the Senate having Republican majority. Three, the currently unfolding, and gradually expanding, Russiagate scam is often compared with the earlier, much better known, Watergate scandal. Here is a relevant extract from a report of that period: "Thus six Republican Congressmen joined all 21 Democrats to recommend that the House of Representatives impeach Richard M. Nixon and seek his removal from the presidency through a Senate trial. And thus the Judiciary Committee climaxed seven months of agonizing inquiry into the conduct of Richard Nixon as President by approving an article of impeachment that charges he violated both his oath to protect the Constitution and his duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed." (Source: <http://time.com/3079519/the-fateful-vote-to-impeach/>.) Also relevant: "The House of Representatives lost patience, voting to impeach Nixon for obstruction of justice, abuse of power, criminal cover-up and several violations of the Constitution. "The tapes which were released on August 5 provided compelling evidence of Nixon’s complicity in the Watergate cover-up. With impeachment by the Senate certain, he resigned on August 8 1974." (Source: <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/0/watergate-nixon-impeached/>.) Four, a section of the US, and international, Left, often also known as "Putinistas", are intent upon projecting Donald Trump as a brave, and lonesome, warrior against the American "Deep State" for the cause of peace (with Russia - the other most major nuclear power), perpetually under dire threat. (See, e.g.: 'Trump and the Deep State: Attempted Coup by the “Intelligence Community”? Kucinich, Greenwald' at <http://www.globalresearch.ca/trump-and-the-deep-state-attempted-coup-by-the-intelligence-community-kucinich-greenwald/5575382>.) The fact of the Republicans rallying round their President, right at this moment, shows up the vacuity of this argument. *It, of course, doesn't mean that if more damaging facts are unearthed in the course of the investigations no one would desert him as a consequence. That possibility, though only possibility, still remains.* Sukla ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: XXX Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 09:29:29 +0530 Subject: Re: [india-unity] Republicans close ranks around Trump during Comey testimony To: [email protected] Hahaha! What else were they expected to do?? Will they let go of the opportunity to control the POTUS, the Senate, the Congress and 39 governors of the country, even when knowing the true situation? They do not care about the have-nots of their country, just like the rulers of the "United" States of India! Power, visibility, money for cronies and some for themselves... the pluses of closing one's eyes to the realities on the ground!! Democracy and independence of the judiciary are good theories!! XXX > On 09-Jun-2017, at 10:47 PM, Sukla Sen [email protected] [india-unity] > <[email protected]> wrote: > > https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/republicans-close-ranks-around-trump-during-comey-testimony/2017/06/08/de444696-4c61-11e7-a186-60c031eab644_story.html?utm_term=.51412ce843b8 > > Republicans close ranks around Trump during Comey testimony > The inside track on Washington politics. > > Sens. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) arrive for > former FBI director James Comey's appearance before the Senate > Intelligence Committee on Thursday. (Jim Bourg/Reuters) > > By Paul Kane By Paul Kane June 8 at 4:33 PM Follow @pkcapitol In early > January, before Donald Trump was sworn in as president, Sen. Marco > Rubio took a brief turn as the highest-profile Republican critic of > Trump’s emerging foreign policy. > > Rubio (R-Fla.) opened his questioning at the Jan. 11 confirmation > hearing for Rex Tillerson, Trump’s nominee for secretary of state, > with blistering questions about whether the ExxonMobil CEO believed > that Russians, at the behest of President Vladimir Putin, had > interfered with the 2016 presidential election. > > Five months later, Trump’s onetime GOP campaign rival displayed a far > different demeanor. In Thursday’s Senate Intelligence Committee > hearing with James B. Comey, the fired FBI director who testified > about his interactions with Trump before his dismissal, Rubio used his > seven-minute stint to blunt allegations that the president’s behavior > toward Comey constituted an obstruction of the FBI’s > counterintelligence investigation of Russia. > Once dismissed by Trump as “Little Marco,” Rubio even homed in on the > issue that has most animated the president: leaks of information > damaging to him. > > “We’ve learned more from the newspapers sometimes than we do from our > open hearings, for sure,” Rubio said to Comey. “You ever wonder why of > all the things in this investigation, the only thing that’s never been > leaked is the fact that the president was not personally under > investigation?” > > (Sarah Parnass/The Washington Post) > [Top intelligence official told associates Trump asked him if he could > intervene with Comey on FBI Russia probe] > > For those wondering whether Republicans are ready to make a sharp > break from Trump, think again. Rubio was among a vast majority of the > Republicans on the committee who, judging from the questioning of > Comey, could well be described as Trump’s political defense team. > > Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), who earlier this year pushed for a more > forceful Russia investigation, pressed Comey on his decision to leak a > Trump-related memo through a friend to the New York Times. Sen. James > Lankford (R-Okla.), who has questioned Trump’s posture toward Russia, > dismissed Comey’s claim that Trump was pressuring him to drop the > probe as “a pretty light touch.” > > And across the Capitol, as Comey was midway through his testimony, > House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) dismissed Trump’s demands of > “loyalty” from Comey as the actions of a novice politician who does > not understand that the FBI needs to maintain its independence from > political influence. “He’s just new to this,” Ryan said of Trump. > > Some Democrats were stunned that Republicans did not break away from > the president. > “Given the fact pattern, it’s a little surprising,” said Sen. Martin > Heinrich (D-N.M.). > Others suggested that the GOP’s reluctance to move against Trump was > understandable because the investigation is still in its infancy. “I > expected it a bit, to be honest with you,” said Sen. Dianne Feinstein > (D-Calif). “I think we’re not at anywhere close to making > conclusions.” > > Feinstein said it will take many more months before the committee can > determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russian hackers or > Trump committed obstruction of justice. “We’re not there yet,” she > said. > > Republicans did not succeed in breaking Comey’s stride or expose > wrongdoing on his part while running the FBI. Nor did they refute the > underlying allegation that Trump fired Comey because he declined to > drop portions of the FBI investigation. There are plenty of doubts > lurking in Republican minds about what will be unearthed next, > sometimes expressed publicly and often expressed privately. > > In the early moments Thursday, Comey clearly commanded the hearing > room in the Hart Senate Office Building, explaining why he kept highly > detailed memos of each of his interactions with Trump from early > January until his May 9 firing. > > “I was honestly concerned that he might lie about the nature of the > meeting,” he said of their first meeting, when he briefed the > president-elect about allegations that Russians had obtained > compromising information on Trump. “I knew that there might come a day > when I’d need a record.” > > Many Republicans felt the need to pay homage to Comey’s long career as > a federal prosecutor and leader of the FBI. “America needs more like > you,” said Sen. James E. Risch (R-Idaho). > > [The man to watch in Rex Tillerson’s confirmation hearing? Marco Rubio.] > > But on the political front, Republicans circled back to the idea that > this portrait painted by Comey was not good for Trump — yet it was > also not a high crime or misdemeanor. > > Rubio stood out in part because of his often personal fights with > Trump during the 2016 presidential primaries. In January he appeared > ready take Tillerson’s nomination down, particularly after Rubio asked > whether Putin was a “war criminal.” > > “I would not use that term,” the future secretary said. > > Later that month, however, Rubio relented, and Tillerson was confirmed > on a narrow vote. > Some saw Rubio as a potential maverick in the Intelligence Committee’s > investigation, and on Wednesday he was forceful in trying to get > Trump’s top intelligence advisers to confirm The Washington Post’s > report that the president had asked them to intervene with Comey to > get him to drop the Flynn investigation. > > On Thursday, however, Rubio kept his questions to Comey in the realm > of narrowing the scope of the allegations. He attempted to diminish > the impact of the allegation that Trump wanted Comey to “let go” of > the Flynn probe. He asked whether Comey responded in any negative > fashion: “Did you say anything to the president about — that is not an > appropriate request? Or did you tell the White House counsel that is > not an appropriate request?” > > No, Comey said — and then Rubio asked the questions about leaks. He > seemed to be suggesting that Comey or his onetime allies at the FBI > were behind the leaks damaging to Trump, asking him to name every > member of his senior leadership team with whom he had discussed his > interactions with Trump. > > Afterward, Rubio told reporters that Trump’s interactions with Comey > were probably not appropriate. “Whether it rises to criminality, you > know, I think there’s significant doubts about whether it rises to > that level,” he said. > > Read more from Paul Kane’s archive, follow him on Twitter or subscribe > to his updates on Facebook. > > -- > Peace Is Doable > -- Peace Is Doable -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
