I/II.
http://www.fox25boston.com/news/group-opposing-nuclear-weapons-wins-nobel-peace-prize/620352496

Group opposing nuclear weapons wins Nobel peace prize

by: JAMEY KEATEN and MARK LEWIS, Associated Press

Updated: Oct 6, 2017 - 7:56 PM

OSLO, Norway (AP) - The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons
won the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday, a forceful show of support for a
grassroots effort that seeks to pressure the world's nuclear powers to give
up the weapons that could destroy the planet.

The choice of the little-known coalition of disarmament activists put the
Nobel committee again at the forefront of geopolitics at a time when fears
are rising over North Korea's nuclear and missile program and the invective
it has drawn from U.S. President Donald Trump.

The committee cited the tiny, Geneva-based ICAN for its work that led to
the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons that was reached in July
at the United Nations.

The group "has been a driving force in prevailing upon the world's nations
to pledge to cooperate ... in efforts to stigmatize, prohibit and eliminate
nuclear weapons," Norwegian Nobel Committee chairwoman Berit Reiss-Andersen
said in the announcement.

More than 120 countries approved the treaty over opposition from
nuclear-armed countries and their allies. In a statement issued after the
Nobel was announced, the U.S. reiterated its position that the treaty "will
not result in the elimination of a single nuclear weapon."

The treaty requires all ratifying countries "never under any circumstances
to develop, test, produce, manufacture, otherwise acquire, possess or
stockpile nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices." It also bans
any transfer or use of nuclear weapons or nuclear explosive devices - and
the threat to use such weapons.

The nuclear powers oppose the treaty, which goes well beyond existing
nonproliferation agreements, arguing that they alone should have the
weapons in order to support stability in the world.

The U.S., Britain and France said the prohibition wouldn't work and would
end up disarming their nations while emboldening what U.S. Ambassador Nikki
Haley called "bad actors." They instead suggest strengthening the
nonproliferation treaty, which they say has made a significant dent in
atomic arsenals.

ICAN, a coalition of 468 nongovernmental groups from over 100 countries,
says that argument is outdated.

"This prize is really a tribute to the tireless efforts of many millions of
campaigners and concerned citizens worldwide who have, ever since the dawn
of the Atomic Age, loudly protested nuclear weapons, insisting that they
can serve no legitimate purpose and must be forever banished from the face
of our Earth," said ICAN executive director Beatrice Fihn.

The prize is likely to give new momentum to ICAN and its allies in the
coming months as the group tries to achieve ratification of the treaty by
50 nations. That would allow the ban to become binding under international
law for those countries and put nuclear-armed states in the uncomfortable
position of being outliers.

On Sept. 20, the first day the treaty was open for signatures, 50 countries
signed it and three submitted their ratifications. Three more countries
have since added their names. ICAN hopes to get the 50 ratifications by the
end of 2018.

Norwegian Nobel Committee chairwoman Berit Reiss-Andersen noted that
international prohibitions have been set on chemical and biological
weapons, land mines and cluster munitions.

"Nuclear weapons are even more destructive, but have not yet been made the
object of a similar international legal prohibition," she said.

The five original nuclear powers - the U.S., Russia, China, Britain and
France, which also are permanent members of the U.N. Security Council -
support nuclear nonproliferation but boycotted the treaty negotiations.
Nuclear-armed India, Pakistan and North Korea didn't vote.

"If you want to make sure that no new states get nuclear weapons, you need
to be ready to reject nuclear weapons themselves," Fihn said. "This treaty
really demands that they walk the walk."

ICAN has its roots in Australia but was launched in Vienna in 2007,
inspired largely by another Nobel peace prize-winning group, the
International Campaign to Ban Landmines.

The $1.1 million prize is likely to help boost ICAN's advocacy. It also
organized events globally in 2015 to mark the 70th anniversaries of the
attacks on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in World War II.

The committee, citing nearly 15,000 nuclear weapons in the world, said "the
risk of nuclear weapons being used is greater than it has been for a long
time."

In 2009, it awarded the prize to President Barack Obama, months after he
laid out the U.S. commitment to "seek the peace and security of a world
without nuclear weapons."

Since then, the U.S. has been a leading voice against the treaty to ban
nuclear weapons. The real lobbying battleground could shape up in countries
like NATO member states, Japan and South Korea that have military alliances
with the U.S., but where activists could be emboldened by the Nobel prize.

Trump has fanned concerns about nuclear conflict, with threats against
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un over the secretive regime's tests, missile
launches over Japan, and warnings that the U.S. territory of Guam could be
next in the firing line.

The Nobel committee wanted "to send a signal to North Korea and the U.S.
that they need to go into negotiations," said Oeivind Stenersen, a
historian of the peace prize.

"The prize is also coded support to the Iran nuclear deal" he said,
alluding to dialogue that won curbs on Tehran's nuclear program.

ICAN's Fihn said many were worried about Trump.

"I think that the election of President Donald Trump has made a lot of
people feel very uncomfortable with the fact that he alone can authorize
the use of nuclear weapons and there's nothing people can do to stop him,"
she told a news conference at the World Council of Churches building that
hosts ICAN's office in Geneva.

"There is no one who we can trust with the ability to destroy the entire
world," she said.

Somewhat unusually for a Nobel peace prize announcement, the nuclear-armed
countries were largely silent or restrained in their reaction.

"Today's announcement does not change the U.S. position on the treaty: the
United States does not support and will not sign the 'Treaty on the
Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons,'" the U.S. State Department said in a
statement.

"Unfortunately, we are seeing a deterioration in the overall security
environment and growing nuclear capabilities of certain states. This treaty
will not make the world more peaceful, will not result in the elimination
of a single nuclear weapon, and will not enhance any state's security," it
said.

It added that the U.S. is committed to "creating the conditions for nuclear
disarmament, a goal we share with our international security partners."

The British and Russian governments did not comment. But British opposition
Labour party leader Jeremy Corbyn - a long-time disarmament campaigner
whose photo hangs in ICAN's Geneva office - congratulated the group.

In a carefully worded statement that did not endorse a nuclear weapons ban,
France's Foreign Ministry said the choice "testifies to the importance of
nuclear nonproliferation in a context marked by the North Korean crisis."

U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres tweeted: "Now more than ever we
need a world without nuclear weapons."

And India sent the group tulips, said ICAN network coordinator Daniel
Hogsta.

"It was nice to send flowers, but we want them to sign the treaty," he said.

___

Keaten reported from Geneva. Associated Press writers Vladimir Isachenkov
in Moscow, Jill Lawless in London, Sylvie Corbet in Paris, George Jahn in
Vienna, Edith M. Lederer at the United Nations and Jim Heintz in Stockholm
contributed.

___

This story corrects that 50 countries signed the treaty the day it opened
for signatures.

II.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/nobel-peace-prize-trump-ican-winners-warning-nuclear-weapons-a7986631.html

Nobel Peace Prize winners issue warning about Trump
'A lot of people feel very uncomfortable with the fact that he alone can
authorise the use of nuclear weapons'

Tom Batchelor @_tombatchelor 19 hours ago

The nuclear disarmament group awarded 2017’s Nobel Peace Prize has issued a
warning about Donald Trump and his supervision of America’s nuclear arsenal.

The International Campaign Against Nuclear Weapons – or Ican – said Mr
Trump’s election put a spotlight on the risks of nuclear weapons and warned
that the US President appeared to be ignoring expert opinion around their
use.

The Norwegian Nobel Committee announced on Friday that Ican was to be
awarded the honour for its work “to draw attention to the catastrophic
humanitarian consequences of any use of nuclear weapons and for its
ground-breaking efforts to achieve a treaty-based prohibition of such
weapons”.


READ MORE
What is Ican? What do they do and why does it matter?
​Ican helped lobby for the the 2017 Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear
Weapons, which was adopted by 122 countries and banned states from
developing, testing, producing, manufacturing, acquiring, possessing, or
stockpiling nuclear weapons.

Responding to the award, Ican's executive director, Beatrice Fihn, said Mr
Trump's election "has made a lot of people feel very uncomfortable with the
fact that he alone can authorise the use of nuclear weapons".

His presidency “puts a spotlight” on the dangers of nuclear weapons, she
said, adding that the commander-in-chief appeared to have a track record of
“not listening to expertise”.

At a news conference after the prize was announced, Ms Fihn was also asked
about a tweet sent two days earlier calling Mr Trump a "moron".

She said she was trying to make a joke, "which I kind of regret now",
following reports that US secretary of state Rex Tillerson had said the
same of the President.

Heightened tensions between the US and North Korea have resulted in an
increasingly bitter war of words between the countries' two leaders, with
Mr Trump threatening to "totally destroy" the hermit state, having earlier
promised "fire and fury like the world has never seen".

Referring to Kim Jong-un as "rocket man", the US President said America was
“ready, willing and able” to take military action.

View image on Twitter
View image on Twitter
 Follow
The Nobel Prize ✔@NobelPrize
Executive Director of ICAN, Beatrice Fihn with signed Treaty on the
Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, 7 July 2017 #NobelPrize
4:14 PM - Oct 6, 2017 · Stockholm, Sweden
 9 9 Replies   228 228 Retweets   405 405 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy

With the standoff between Pyongyang and Washington worsening, the Nobel
committee said Ican’s efforts to “stigmatise, prohibit and eliminate
nuclear weapons” were more vital than ever.

"Risk of nuclear weapons being used is greater than it has been for a long
time," the committee said.

"Some states are modernising their nuclear arsenals, and there is a real
danger that more countries will try to procure nuclear weapons, as
exemplified by North Korea."

Ican responded that the "spectre of nuclear conflict looms large once more".

“If ever there were a moment for nations to declare their unequivocal
opposition to nuclear weapons, that moment is now," the group said.


-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to