[How does it work? When the nuclear armed states are refusing to join the
ban treaty, and indeed, the United States is actively discouraging states,
how is disarmament possible?
...
In 1996, the International Court of Justice regretted that no explicit law
exists in the world prohibiting nuclear weapons. The ban treaty now plugs
that hole. It bans all nuclear weapons. The Treaty on the Non-proliferation
of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) does not do that. It only allows a few states to
keep their nuclear weapons while promising to eliminate them eventually.
So, the plan is simple. Stigmatise nukes, then eliminate them. Stigmatise,
meaning, keeping nukes will be uncool.
To stigmatise, you only need a law that prohibits nukes. And that law need
not be created by the nuclear armed states. The non-nuclear armed states
may not have nukes, but they have the numbers to create that law. ICAN
launched a campaign that empowered the weak states to take on the Goliath
of the nuclear powers by making them believe that non-nuclear states can
lead us to a nuclear weapons-free world. Creating the law first and
eliminating after that is true of every disarmament treaty in history.]

http://www.hindustantimes.com/opinion/nobel-peace-prize-winner-ican-has-disarmed-critics-the-nukes-are-next/story-JDBJAoafgZvonwiZ11LwmK.html

Nobel Peace Prize winner ICAN has disarmed critics. The nukes are next
The peace Nobel to ICAN has disarmed many of its critics. It’s a
recognition that ridding the world of nuclear weapons is not an idealist’s
fantasy, but a robust action plan

OPINION Updated: Oct 09, 2017 10:56 IST
Vidya Shankar Aiyar

Beatrice Fihn, executive director of the International Campaign to Abolish
Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), receives a bottle of champagne from her husband
Will Fihm Ramsay (R) next to Daniel Hogsta, coordinator, while they
celebrate after the organisation won the Nobel Peace Prize 2017, Geneva,
Switzerland, on October 6.(Reuters)

A little-known movement for a nuclear weapons-free world won the Nobel
Peace Prize last week. The International Campaign to Abolish to Nuclear
Weapons, ICAN (nuclearban.org, @nuclearban) is a movement of several
hundred organisations and individuals spread over a hundred countries. It’s
a movement of all the little guys banding together to take on the big bad
world of the nuclear armed. Even little guys like me, the lone civil
society participant from India at the crucial Geneva debates last summer.
It was at Geneva that the resolution to the UN General Assembly was drawn
up, that culminated in the Treaty to Prohibit Nuclear Weapons on July 7.

Ever since I quit TV news in 2008, an inevitable eye roll would follow when
I revealed that I work on nuclear disarmament issues. Usually that would be
followed by a commiserating, “Oh, zero nukes is a noble goal, but
impractical, isn’t it? You should try for smaller numbers.” The peace Nobel
to ICAN has disarmed many such critics. It’s a recognition that ridding the
world of nuclear weapons is not an idealist’s fantasy, but a robust action
plan.

Read more

Text of Nobel Peace Prize award to anti-nuclear campaign ICAN

Donald Trump presidency puts ‘spotlight’ on nuclear risk: Nobel winners ICAN
How does it work? When the nuclear armed states are refusing to join the
ban treaty, and indeed, the United States is actively discouraging states,
how is disarmament possible?

The world of nuclear disarmament has changed tremendously from the days
when stodgy, Leftist intellectuals formed its backbone. Now it is mainly a
young people’s movement, young people who are armed with social media,
incredible energy and the willingness to try the impossible, and they are
spread across the globe. ICAN’s women are a tour de force. A cooler set of
people would be hard to find. And they have the experience, wisdom and
knowledge to back their credentials.

In 1996, the International Court of Justice regretted that no explicit law
exists in the world prohibiting nuclear weapons. The ban treaty now plugs
that hole. It bans all nuclear weapons. The Treaty on the Non-proliferation
of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) does not do that. It only allows a few states to
keep their nuclear weapons while promising to eliminate them eventually.
So, the plan is simple. Stigmatise nukes, then eliminate them. Stigmatise,
meaning, keeping nukes will be uncool.

To stigmatise, you only need a law that prohibits nukes. And that law need
not be created by the nuclear armed states. The non-nuclear armed states
may not have nukes, but they have the numbers to create that law. ICAN
launched a campaign that empowered the weak states to take on the Goliath
of the nuclear powers by making them believe that non-nuclear states can
lead us to a nuclear weapons-free world. Creating the law first and
eliminating after that is true of every disarmament treaty in history.

To get such states on board, ICAN chose to campaign on the humanitarian
impact of nuclear weapons. This is where ICAN got a lot of help from key
states and organisations. Its key events in Oslo, Nayarit and Vienna over
2013-14 made it clear that the world does not have the capacity to deal
with the fallout of a nuclear war. And the fallout would be global and
catastrophic, no matter where the conflict happens. Norway first gave ICAN
the platform. Mexico gave it momentum on the American continent. Austria
rallied 127 states under the Austrian pledge to disarm. The job was now up
to ICAN and its campaigners to move the debate out of the moribund
Conference on Disarmament in Geneva to the UN General Assembly, and get
these states to put their money where their mouth is. Finally, the ban
treaty opened for signature on September 20, and is expected to come into
force soon.

No, nuclear weapons will not be dismantled immediately, but give it time
like other treaties. Equally, no nuclear-armed State can indefinitely say
that nuclear weapons are necessary for its security. That would violate a
new law and would incite proliferation. This is the logic that provoked Kim
Jong-un to counter Donald Trump’s America. Don’t underestimate the small
guys. They’ve disarmed the critics. The nukes are next.

Vidya Shankar Aiyar is an anti-nuclear weapons activist

The views expressed are personal

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to