[That perhaps explains why the Adityanath government is pushing for the
merger of Shia and Sunni Waqf boards: 'UP govt plans to merge Shia, Sunni
Waqf boards to prevent ‘wastage of money’' at <
http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/up-govt-plans-to-merge-shia-sunni-waqf-boards-to-prevent-wastage-of-money/story-qjkzlsbOw7AeqrdFGOI7pN.html
>.]

http://www.hindustantimes.com/lucknow/shia-waqf-board-writes-to-pm-modi-seeks-demolition-of-humayun-s-tomb-for-graveyard/story-Xs7WYHAHxnWfNpTvQq83pN.html

Shia Waqf Board writes to PM Modi, seeks demolition of Humayun’s tomb for
graveyard
Board’s chairman Waeem Rizvi says the tombs of Mughal rulers cannot be a
national heritage and should be demolished in public interest

LUCKNOW Updated: Oct 25, 2017 13:29 IST
Haidar Naqvi

Hindustan Times, Kanpur

The Uttar Pradesh Shia Central Waqf Board has proposed demolition of the
tomb of Mughal emperor Humayun to make space for burial of Muslims.(File
Photo)

The Uttar Pradesh Shia Central Waqf Board has proposed demolition of the
tomb of Mughal emperor Humayun to make space for burial of Muslims.

In a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the Board’s chairman Waseem
Rizvi has suggested that demolition of the tomb would solve the acute
problem that the Muslims face in the burial of their dead in the national
capital as there is no space in existing graveyards and new land is not
available.

The Board said there was no hindrance as per Islam in bringing down the
structure.

Rizvi said the Mughals came from other countries and plundered India’s
wealth and established their rule.

“The Mughals harmed the Indian culture and historians have estimated that
they misused their power to demolish 3,000 temples. The Mughals were
neither the propagators of Islam nor were they righteous rulers. Their
graves or tombs cannot be a national heritage,” he said.

Rizvi wrote the letter after All-India Rabta-e-Masajid and Madaris-e-
Islamia asked the Board to provide land for graveyard in a UP area close to
Delhi.

Read More | Babri dispute: Shia Waqf Board says mosque can come up at a
distance

“We tried to find out a right piece of land but it emerged that the Board
did not have big land close to Delhi. The problem is serious in nature and
demolition of the tomb would make 35 acres land available for Muslims,” the
letter said.

According to Rizvi, the tomb has no religious structure in its vicinity and
has a grave of the emperor. “It can easily be perceived as a graveyard. It
tomb should be demolished in the national capital in public interest,” he
said.

“The Muslim community to which Humayun belonged do not recognize any tomb
as a part of its ideology and theology,” he said citing several instances
from Saudi Arabia where a number of historical tombs, including the one of
Fatima Zahra, daughter of Prophet Mohammad, were demolished in 1925.

“Such Muslims do not have an issue with the demolition of tombs,” he added.

Read More: UP Shia board to gift silver arrows for Lord Ram’s statue in
Ayodhya

He said the Government of India did not earn from the tomb but spent a huge
amount on its maintenance. “Public money shouldn’t be spent on preserving
graves of unjust rulers,” he said urging the PM to grant permission to his
proposal.

Shia Waqf Board has also stoked controversies in the recent past. It filed
an affidavit in the Supreme Court claiming the Babri Masjid was its
property, suggesting the new mosque could be built in Ayodhya at a
reasonable distance from the birth place of Lord Ram. It also asserted that
the mosque was built demolishing a temple

The Board also announced to gift 10 silver arrows when the state government
comes up with the 100-metre statue of Lord Ram in Ayodhya.

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to