[Allegations such as these are common during an election. But what has
raised concerns is the manner in which the footage was leaked. Though it
outright denied the meeting, the Congress pointed fingers at the state
police and the intelligence bureau, claiming that both Gandhi and Patel
have been put under illegal surveillance by the state government. How did
select television channels get access to the footage so quickly if not with
the help of the police, was the Congress’s poser.
This is not the first time that a snooping allegation has been made in the
context of the Patidar leader. In 2015, the Gujarat police was accused of
tapping Patel’s phones during the Patidar agitations, a matter that went up
to the Gujarat High Court.
There have been other such cases of snooping in Gujarat, most infamous of
which was of a woman in 2009. Both then chief minister Modi and the BJP
president Amit Shah, who was then a minister in the state, were directly
dragged into the case where allegations of surveillance on a young
architect was made.]


https://scroll.in/article/855443/the-daily-fix-if-gujarat-police-did-snoop-on-hardik-patel-it-is-a-clear-breach-of-right-to-privacy

If Gujarat police did snoop on Hardik Patel, it is a clear breach of right
to privacy

by  Sruthisagar Yamunan

Published 9 hours ago

Invading Privacy
With the Election Commission of India announcing on Wednesday that Gujarat
will go to polls on December 9 and 14, the election campaign in the home
state of Prime Minister Narendra Modi has reached a feverish pitch.

Unlike 2012, the Bharatiya Janata Party is facing challenges from multiple
corners in Gujarat, where young leaders claiming to represent the interests
of powerful communities have become a thorn in the flesh of the ruling
party. Perhaps the most challenging among them is Hardik Patel, the Patidar
Anamant Andolan Samiti convenor, who led the Patidars’ agitations in 2015
demanding reservations.

The BJP has left no stone unturned to counter the 24-year-old, with Patel
facing multiple criminal cases filed during the agitations in 2015,
including a case of ransacking a BJP office on which a court issued a
non-bailable warrant on Wednesday. One of the strategies used by the BJP to
delegitimise the young leader is to project him as a pawn in the political
game of the Congress, something the party hopes would bring his supporters
back to the BJP. In previous elections, the Patels were considered an
important vote bloc of the BJP.

However, this week’s developments have left the Opposition wondering to
what level the BJP would go to complete this delegitimising process of
Patel. On Monday, CCTV footage from a hotel in Ahmedabad was selectively
leaked to certain television channels. The footage showed Patel hurriedly
leaving a hotel after allegedly meeting Congress vice president Rahul
Gandhi. With clockwork precision, the BJP went to town with the video,
pointing to the footage as decisive proof of its accusation that Patel and
Gandhi were in a secret alliance against the ruling party.

Allegations such as these are common during an election. But what has
raised concerns is the manner in which the footage was leaked. Though it
outright denied the meeting, the Congress pointed fingers at the state
police and the intelligence bureau, claiming that both Gandhi and Patel
have been put under illegal surveillance by the state government. How did
select television channels get access to the footage so quickly if not with
the help of the police, was the Congress’s poser.

This is not the first time that a snooping allegation has been made in the
context of the Patidar leader. In 2015, the Gujarat police was accused of
tapping Patel’s phones during the Patidar agitations, a matter that went up
to the Gujarat High Court.

There have been other such cases of snooping in Gujarat, most infamous of
which was of a woman in 2009. Both then chief minister Modi and the BJP
president Amit Shah, who was then a minister in the state, were directly
dragged into the case where allegations of surveillance on a young
architect was made.

While the police, in the course of criminal investigations, do resort to
surveillance in order to collect evidence, such actions are undertaken
after obtaining due permission through procedures established by law. If
the Congress’s allegations are to be believed, the police in Gujarat seem
to have misused their powers in the process of aiding the ruling party.
This is a grave charge of violating several fundamental rights, especially
since the Supreme Court has declared that citizens have a fundamental right
to privacy which is an integral part of right to life. Even if the police,
as it has claimed, had no role to play in the incident, it is incumbent on
them to investigate how the leak happened, given that the charge of illegal
surveillance involved Rahul Gandhi, whose security is covered by the
Special Protection Group and is considered to be among high-risk targets in
the country.

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to