[<<In 2014, Modi ran on a platform of vikas but mostly delivered Hindutva.
In 2019, he ran on a platform of Hindutva, with little talk of vikas, smart
cities, beti bachao, black money, or Skill India. In 2019, Modi wore his
religion on his sleeve. He and his party incited fear of the ‘other’ and
made dog whistles and thinly veiled threats of violence and genocide. He
gave Lok Sabha tickets to noted communal bigots of the RSS, including one
who calls Godse a patriot. So what can we rationally expect from Modi this
time? Even less vikas, I think, when the mandate is clearly for Hindutva,
paving the way for the far right’s dream of a Hindu Rashtra, a state
legally conceived not as secular but a Hindu polity and whose structures
and institutions are based on the forms and priorities of Hindu culture and
religion.

So how did Modi win this time? A big part of the answer is the powerful
opium of Hindu nationalism. The BJP won because a great many Hindus are
high on Hindutva. The Sangh Parivar has learned to exploit the well-known
cultural inferiority complex of the Hindu middle class, which grew out of
India’s colonial encounter with Europe. Alongside, they stoke fears that a
billion-plus Hindus are under siege by Muslims, refugees, leftists,
Pakistan and pesky “anti-nationals.” The well-funded propaganda arms of the
BJP and Sangh Parivar spread a lurid and manufactured sense of historical
hurt, key to sustaining Hindutva nationalism. Run by an army of paid
trolls, they fan both hate and pride by peddling fantasies of past
greatness, military might, superpower dreams, surgical strikes and fake
news. The ordinary Hindu’s sense of history is now filled with malicious
lies and manufactured resentments against pre-colonial Muslim rule and he
wants to settle the score by punishing today’s Muslims.

Other social changes are feeding the beast too. Upper-caste Hindus have
been the most reliable vote bank for the BJP, but the Hindu rightwing has
long emphasised a Hindu identity over caste identity to lure more Dalits
and OBCs into the Hindutva fold, crucial for their electoral maths. This is
working out all too well. A weaponised Hindu identity increasingly trumps
caste identity. Results from Uttar Pradesh and Bihar show that a
consolidated Hindutva vote bank is steadily replacing the fragmented vote
banks of caste. In Varanasi, I met men of Dom and Mallah castes who
subscribe to Hindutva. The Sangh Parivar has extended Hindutva deeper and
wider ever since they began offering useful social services to people in
the early 1990s. These services became their vehicle for massive organized
indoctrination in rural and small-town India, against which the
left-liberals have no antidote. Consequently, too many people are now high
on the social virus of Hindu nationalism and anti-Muslim passions – this is
the new India.
...
During the voting season, I’d predicted that BJP’s decision to lead with
Hindutva and its cynical post-Pulwama airstrikes would be a winning
strategy. It more than offset their failures on the economy – a trick that
countless demagogues have tried. Stated differently, the BJP’s actual
performance on the economy became irrelevant against the joys and psychic
highs of Hindu pride and nationalism, which the BJP stoked, playing the
people like a fiddle. The BJP turned hate and anger into an animating,
intoxicating and rallying force – risking the unleashing of even darker
forces that, in time, they may not be able to control. Among other big
contributors to the BJP victory were a brazenly partisan media that stumps
for Modi and cultivates support for authoritarian rule; high octane
propaganda on social media; and a hopelessly divided political opposition,
who undercut each other’s votes in India’s first-past-the-post system.

Many have noted the parallels between India’s collective madness of
xenophobic religious nationalism and trends in Brazil, the US, Turkey, etc.
But these countries differ too and each will need to find its own modes of
resistance and reform. A new age now begins in India, of bigots like that
auto driver in Varanasi, who are joined by white-collar bigots in my school
and college WhatsApp groups. Together with their supreme leader, they’ll go
down the path of the chauvinist, the dolt, the bully, the fanatic, the
fascist – an India where dissent is unwelcome, diversity is suspect and the
life of the mind is a threat to the republic. A new reality dawns, in which
the barbarians are no longer at the gates, but are emerging vertically, as
if from the trapdoors, all around us in our streets, homes, offices. For
many Indian citizens, this is the time to take stock, regroup and prepare
for a whole new battle for the soul of their society.>>]

https://himalmag.com/a-collective-madness-india-elecions-modi-namit-arora-2019/


A collective madness

BY NAMIT ARORA

27 MAY 2019

What Modi’s victory says about today’s India.

Photo: @narendramodi / Facebook

In Varanasi recently, I took an auto-rickshaw from Godowlia to Assi Ghat.
Like everyone else in town, the driver and I began talking politics. The
2019 general election was a week away and Prime Minister Narendra Modi was
seeking reelection from Varanasi. The driver was an ardent Modi fan and
would hear no criticism of him. He even claimed that demonetisation had
punished the corrupt rich. One topic led to another and soon he was loudly
praising Nathuram Godse as a patriot – Gandhi deserved no less than a
bullet for being a Muslim lover. “You don’t know these people,” he
thundered. “Read our history! Only Muslims have killed their own fathers to
become kings. Has any Hindu ever done so? Inki jaat hi aisi hai. You too
should open your mobile and read on WhatsApp. Kamina Rahul is born of a
Muslim and a Christian; Nehru’s grandfather, also Muslim, Mughal. Outsiders
all. Modi will teach them!” Fortunately, my destination came before his
passion for the topic could escalate further.

I entered Assi Ghat with a numbing sadness. Was this really Kashi, among
the oldest continuously inhabited cities of the world, known for its
religious pluralism and massive density of gods, creeds and houses of
worship, with its long history of largely peaceful coexistence? The Kashi
of the Buddha, Adi Shankara, Kabir, Ravidas and Nanak? The Kashi of shehnai
maestro Bismillah Khan, who lived in its tangled gullies and regularly
played during the aarti in Balaji temple, or of Hindustani vocalist Girija
Devi, whose family kept mannats on Muharram? What still remains of its
famed Ganga-Jamuna tehzeeb? No, I consoled myself, my auto driver was not
the norm in Varanasi, but he did herald certain fundamental changes now
sweeping the country.

On the campaign trail in 2014, Modi spoke about vikas and an ambitious
model of economic development. Modi and his party also had a cultural
agenda, but he didn’t make it central to his campaign. He promised a
hundred new cities, modern infrastructure, crores of jobs, big reforms,
black money recovery and a new era of world-class manufacturing alongside a
program of skill development for Indian workers. “Development” was then the
perfect sales pitch, using which, Modi slyly recast himself into a vikas
purush, or development man. Many liberals too went along, ignoring his role
in the 2002 anti-Muslim pogrom in Gujarat, hoping that he would be a
disciplined and pragmatic manager of the economy, deliver on campaign
promises, advance science and knowledge and downplay political Hinduism,
aka Hindutva, the party’s divisive Hindu nationalist ideology.

Modi soon revealed his true colors. At heart, he was still an ill-informed,
vindictive, parochial man of the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) with no
decent moral centre. The defining feature of the Modi regime has been its
bumbling incompetence. Modi appointed loutish men of the RSS, a volunteer
paramilitary, part of a collective of far-right groups, the Sangh Parivar,
to lead many ministries and key institutions. In its early years, his
regime cut the already low public spending on health and education. It
began undermining democratic institutions – the media, judiciary, the RBI,
the Election Commission, public universities – the list is long. It peddled
pseudo-science, fixated on the cow and her piss and changed history
textbooks to glorify Hindu civilisation and Hindu rulers. His regime
harassed many high-profile national and international NGOs including
Sabrang, Amnesty International and Greenpeace. Making campaign financing
more opaque, it legalised crony capitalism that funded the party’s lavish
campaign in 2019. It gave free rein to violent vigilante groups that
harassed or killed Muslims, Dalits, inter-faith couples, activists and
leftist students, furthering a coarse and vicious anti-minority discourse
in public life. Most offenders not only remain unpunished, some were even
celebrated by a minister of state. An aging Muslim master weaver in
Varanasi told me that more than communal riots, he worries about the
psychological impact of hate-crime videos that show saffron-clad men
lynching Muslims, which endlessly get forwarded and replayed on mobile
phones among young Muslim men.

Five years later, barring qualified progress in some areas – toilets,
roads, renewable energy, cooking gas – Modi’s promise of vikas has turned
out empty. Even governments we rate below-average have arguably delivered
similarly spotty progress, as in the preceding UPA regime. Make in India,
Skill India and Digital India mostly remain slogans. Demonetisation showed
the gaping idiocy and dangerous autocracy in Modi’s decision-making, which
callously overruled the advice from experts that only a miniscule amount of
black money was in cash. Far from raising India’s prestige and soft power
in the world, the press in Europe and North America mostly brackets him and
his movement with dubious figures like Trump, Putin, Ergodan and Bolsonaro.
Modi has said the climate is not changing, our tolerance for the weather
is. He holds asinine views about ancient Hindu feats in genetic science and
cosmetic surgery. Despite a historic windfall from low oil prices, he now
presides over a deepening farm crisis, an economic slowdown and the highest
unemployment in 45 years. Vikas?

In 2014, Modi ran on a platform of vikas but mostly delivered Hindutva. In
2019, he ran on a platform of Hindutva, with little talk of vikas, smart
cities, beti bachao, black money, or Skill India. In 2019, Modi wore his
religion on his sleeve. He and his party incited fear of the ‘other’ and
made dog whistles and thinly veiled threats of violence and genocide. He
gave Lok Sabha tickets to noted communal bigots of the RSS, including one
who calls Godse a patriot. So what can we rationally expect from Modi this
time? Even less vikas, I think, when the mandate is clearly for Hindutva,
paving the way for the far right’s dream of a Hindu Rashtra, a state
legally conceived not as secular but a Hindu polity and whose structures
and institutions are based on the forms and priorities of Hindu culture and
religion.

So how did Modi win this time? A big part of the answer is the powerful
opium of Hindu nationalism. The BJP won because a great many Hindus are
high on Hindutva. The Sangh Parivar has learned to exploit the well-known
cultural inferiority complex of the Hindu middle class, which grew out of
India’s colonial encounter with Europe. Alongside, they stoke fears that a
billion-plus Hindus are under siege by Muslims, refugees, leftists,
Pakistan and pesky “anti-nationals.” The well-funded propaganda arms of the
BJP and Sangh Parivar spread a lurid and manufactured sense of historical
hurt, key to sustaining Hindutva nationalism. Run by an army of paid
trolls, they fan both hate and pride by peddling fantasies of past
greatness, military might, superpower dreams, surgical strikes and fake
news. The ordinary Hindu’s sense of history is now filled with malicious
lies and manufactured resentments against pre-colonial Muslim rule and he
wants to settle the score by punishing today’s Muslims.

Other social changes are feeding the beast too. Upper-caste Hindus have
been the most reliable vote bank for the BJP, but the Hindu rightwing has
long emphasised a Hindu identity over caste identity to lure more Dalits
and OBCs into the Hindutva fold, crucial for their electoral maths. This is
working out all too well. A weaponised Hindu identity increasingly trumps
caste identity. Results from Uttar Pradesh and Bihar show that a
consolidated Hindutva vote bank is steadily replacing the fragmented vote
banks of caste. In Varanasi, I met men of Dom and Mallah castes who
subscribe to Hindutva. The Sangh Parivar has extended Hindutva deeper and
wider ever since they began offering useful social services to people in
the early 1990s. These services became their vehicle for massive organized
indoctrination in rural and small-town India, against which the
left-liberals have no antidote. Consequently, too many people are now high
on the social virus of Hindu nationalism and anti-Muslim passions – this is
the new India.

A very disturbing change I’ve seen in the last five years is the impunity
with which ordinary Hindus, including my friends, relatives and neighbors,
now spew venom against Muslims as a group and feel no shame at all. It even
seems to add meaning and intensity to their lives. They decry secularism as
a depleted idea and long for a strongman to crush the ‘sickulars’, who they
falsely allege have been ‘appeasing’ Muslims, a group that now has some of
the worst socioeconomic indicators. They entrust the economy only to those
who parade their love for the nation by chanting crude slogans and demand
the same from others. A significant section of Indian professionals too –
engineers, doctors, MBAs – display an uncritical adoration of Modi and his
authoritarian instincts. Unlike Trump supporters in the US, the rot in
India especially pervades the most educated classes and the youth. This
makes the Indian situation more tragic and despairing, starkly exposing the
flaws of a pedagogy that relies on rote learning and makes no time for even
basic liberal education or the cultivation of civic sense and critical
thinking, which might help safeguard democracy. These folks – suckers for
absurd rumors and conspiracy theories about Muslims – now openly air their
bigotry and willful ignorance even on social media, while discussing “the
Muslim problem” and their “rapid breeding”. This sectarian poison has
spread too far and it’ll take a terrible human toll in the years ahead.

Many people surely voted for the BJP because some vikas did reach them. But
given how little vikas there was, most people must have had other reasons
for supporting the BJP – reasons capable of explaining their fierce loyalty
and unthinking devotion to Modi. Some people I know cited “no viable
alternative” as a reason to vote for the BJP. But probing a little usually
reveals ignoble motivations beneath their enthusiasm for the BJP, despite
its nasty 2019 campaign. People in Kerala and Tamil Nadu didn’t cite that
reason and kept the BJP out. In short, most people supported Modi’s BJP
largely for its muscular, militant, Hindu-honoring and Muslim-baiting
ideology of the nation, even as they may deny this to themselves. They’ve
democratically chosen a party that has little love for democracy or its
values. In his victory speech, Modi even gloated that he had silenced the
entire “tribe of seculars” for good.

During the voting season, I’d predicted that BJP’s decision to lead with
Hindutva and its cynical post-Pulwama airstrikes would be a winning
strategy. It more than offset their failures on the economy – a trick that
countless demagogues have tried. Stated differently, the BJP’s actual
performance on the economy became irrelevant against the joys and psychic
highs of Hindu pride and nationalism, which the BJP stoked, playing the
people like a fiddle. The BJP turned hate and anger into an animating,
intoxicating and rallying force – risking the unleashing of even darker
forces that, in time, they may not be able to control. Among other big
contributors to the BJP victory were a brazenly partisan media that stumps
for Modi and cultivates support for authoritarian rule; high octane
propaganda on social media; and a hopelessly divided political opposition,
who undercut each other’s votes in India’s first-past-the-post system.

Many have noted the parallels between India’s collective madness of
xenophobic religious nationalism and trends in Brazil, the US, Turkey, etc.
But these countries differ too and each will need to find its own modes of
resistance and reform. A new age now begins in India, of bigots like that
auto driver in Varanasi, who are joined by white-collar bigots in my school
and college WhatsApp groups. Together with their supreme leader, they’ll go
down the path of the chauvinist, the dolt, the bully, the fanatic, the
fascist – an India where dissent is unwelcome, diversity is suspect and the
life of the mind is a threat to the republic. A new reality dawns, in which
the barbarians are no longer at the gates, but are emerging vertically, as
if from the trapdoors, all around us in our streets, homes, offices. For
many Indian citizens, this is the time to take stock, regroup and prepare
for a whole new battle for the soul of their society.

***

~ Namit Arora is the author of The Lottery of Birth: On Inherited Social
Inequalities (2017) and two forthcoming books: a novel and another on
travel and history. His home on the web is shunya.net.
-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/greenyouth/CACEsOZjKEqEa9X39YFfsF%3D7k7FwNQuXFMHwczGihaHiEq2d0NA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to