So, the pitch of the nuclear threat is now still further raised, by a
couple of notches (ref.: <
https://groups.google.com/g/greenyouth/c/o-bpxKYZR30>).

On the ground, the war, which had largely been anticipated to be over in
about two-to-four days, at the end of the third week or so started
appearing to be stalemated - despite relentless bombing of cities including
schools, hospitals and various other civilian facilities by the invading
forces.
Now, with the first month having been over, the invading forces, at least
in patches, are, apparently, being even forced back.
That's the backdrop.

Biden, in the meanwhile, despite his loud proclamations of support, appears
to be too cautious and too miserly in providing necessary military hardware
to the defending forces.
His refusal to provide air cover is, of course, well taken - given the
risks involved.

On the issue of justifying any possible use of nuclear weapons on the
ground of countering *an act of aggression committed against Russia and its
allies, jeopardising the existence of the country itself, even without the
use of nuclear weapons, that is, with the use of conventional weapons*,
does it need be told that in *the instant case **Russia, led by Putin, is
just not clearly the aggressor but the war is also being fought only on the
territory of Ukraine and not of Russia - by any whatever stretch.*
Hence, *these brazen attempts at nuclear blackmailing call for the most
emphatic denunciation.*

Sukla

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/26/russia-reasserts-right-to-use-nuclear-weapons-in-ukraine-putin
theguardian.com
<https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/26/russia-reasserts-right-to-use-nuclear-weapons-in-ukraine-putin>
Russia reasserts right to use nuclear weapons in Ukraine
Daniel Boffey

------------------------------

The Kremlin again raised the spectre of the use of nuclear weapons in the
war with Ukraine <https://www.theguardian.com/world/ukraine> as Russian
forces struggled to hold a key city in the south of the country.

Dmitry Medvedev, a former Russian president who is deputy chairman of the
country’s security council, said Moscow could strike against an enemy that
only used conventional weapons while Vladimir Putin’s defence minister
claimed nuclear “readiness” was a priority.

The comments on Saturday prompted Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy,
in an appearance by video link at Qatar’s Doha Forum to warn that Moscow
was a direct threat to the world.

“Russia is deliberating bragging they can destroy with nuclear weapons, not
only a certain country but the entire planet,” Zelenskiy said.

Putin established the nuclear threat at the start of the war, warning that
western intervention would reap “consequences you have never seen”.

Western officials have said the threats may be simply an attempt to divert
attention from the failure of Putin’s forces to secure a swift occupation
of the Ukrainian capital, Kyiv, and to make advances in other key areas of
the country.

An adviser to Ukraine’s defence ministry, Markian Lubkivskyi, claimed on
Saturday that Russia would soon lose control of the southern city of
Kherson, the first major centre to fall to the Kremlin since the war began
on 24 February.

He said: “I believe that today the city will be fully under the control of
Ukrainian armed forces. We have finished in the last two days the operation
in the Kyiv region so other armed forces are now focused on the southern
part trying to get free Kherson and some other Ukrainian cities.”

Russia has approximately 6,000 nuclear warheads – the largest stockpile of
nuclear weapons in the world. In an interview on Saturday, Medvedev said
Russia’s nuclear doctrine did not require an enemy state to use such
weapons first.

He said: “We have a special document on nuclear deterrence. This document
clearly indicates the grounds on which the Russian Federation is entitled
to use nuclear weapons. There are a few of them, let me remind them to you:
number one is the situation, when Russia is struck by a nuclear missile.
The second case is any use of other nuclear weapons against Russia or its
allies.

“The third is an attack on a critical infrastructure that will have
paralysed our nuclear deterrent forces. And the fourth case is when an act
of aggression is committed against Russia and its allies, which jeopardised
the existence of the country itself, even without the use of nuclear
weapons, that is, with the use of conventional weapons.”

Medvedev added that there was a “determination to defend the independence,
sovereignty of our country, not to give anyone a reason to doubt even the
slightest that we are ready to give a worthy response to any infringement
on our country, on its independence”.

Russia’s defence minister, Sergei Shoigu, who had not been seen for 12 days
before a brief appearance on Friday and an address to his generals on
Saturday, also spoke about the nuclear threat contained within Russia’s
arsenal.

In a video, uploaded on social media by the Russian defence ministry,
Shoigu said he had discussed issues related to the military budget and
defence orders with the finance ministry.

He said: “We continue ahead-of-schedule delivery of weaponry and equipment
by means of credits. The priorities are long-range, high-precision weapons,
aircraft equipment and maintenance of engagement readiness of strategic
nuclear forces.”


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"binayakplanning" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/binayakplanning/CAP7zoGaNWU64-5MtVZ7V7bf15x1ZP8bk_TAC8wjiOFNVjZajdw%40mail.gmail.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/binayakplanning/CAP7zoGaNWU64-5MtVZ7V7bf15x1ZP8bk_TAC8wjiOFNVjZajdw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/greenyouth/CACEsOZisoo%2Bi_6tQMnQ%3D4pGvKBUuNv_qtmW-ZyGS3T9_r%3Djc5g%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to