Thanks for the information :-) Pierre Couderc corrected me aswell... I should stop doing such comments given my complete lack of knowledge of semiology ;-)
Olivier 2014-03-06 13:49 GMT+01:00 Home <[email protected]>: > Olivier, > > I don't think the bug tracker is the best forum for my reply since the > essence of the bug is not changed, so I am replying directly. > > I beg to differ. The figure I attached is indeed a salicus. I'm sure the > confusion between scandicus and salicus noted at the link you provided is > one of the reasons Solesmes has adopted the figure with the oriscus in the > middle as the salicus since the 1983 publication of the Liber Hymnarius. As > noted in the link, this is also why Dom Mocquereau placed the ictus as an > editorial mark under the second note of a salicus. As you probably know, > the figure for a salicus in the non-diastematic notation, in both Laon and > St. Gall, is a punctum-oriscus-virga, so the figure adopted by Solesmes in > more recent books, like the Antiphonale Romanum II, the source of the > figure I attached, is rather appropriate. > > Regards, > Henry > > > > On March 6, 2014 4:05:01 AM Olivier Berten <NO-REPLY.INVALID-ADDRESS@gna. > org> wrote: > > Follow-up Comment #1, bug #21502 (project gregorio): >> >> According to the litterature <http://www.ccwatershed.org/Gregorian/08/>, >> this >> is rather a scandicus. And it is indeed missing from gregorio, with or >> without >> oriscus. >> >> (file #20272) >> _______________________________________________________ >> >> Additional Item Attachment: >> >> File name: extended_scandicus.png Size:0 KB >> >> >> _______________________________________________________ >> >> Reply to this item at: >> >> <http://gna.org/bugs/?21502> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Message posté via/par Gna! >> http://gna.org/ >> >> > >
_______________________________________________ Gregorio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-devel
