Le 22/04/2015 04:38, Henry T. So Jr. a écrit : > I have had one problem with the greciliae font (and Caeciliae before > it), which is that the stropha and the "punctum inclinatum" look too > similar. I feel like it's probably too presumptuous of me to change > those glyphs for everyone, but at same time, to create and maintain a > whole other font for the sake of two glyphs (the stropha and it's > liquescent counterpart) seems overkill.
Absolutely. In fact I'm very glad you raise the problem, because you're not the only one not liking the stropha of Greciliae. Attached is a font (a fork from an outdated greciliae-base.sfd) containing a changed stropha, what do you think about it? > What do you think of implementing some sort of variant system? It could > be as straightforward as creating extra glyphs and having the user > redefine the symbols as desired, or as complex as having macros that do > the same. I have noticed that we already have some support for font > variation in the "punctum cavum" glyphs, so maybe this idea is not too > far-fetched. I think it's the way to go, indeed! > I think we can also use such a feature for the alternate (older) oriscus > shape that was discussed on the list a few years ago. I admit I can't remember that... Do you have a pointer? Thank you, -- Elie
greciliae-ruth1.sfd
Description: application/vnd.font-fontforge-sfd
_______________________________________________ Gregorio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-devel
