Le 19/06/2015 17:27, Br. Samuel Springuel a écrit : > Given the number of changes in 4.0, I think a beta is in order. > > Timeline wise, I'll comment on just the issue I'm involved with. > Since the remaining phase of the TeX renaming deals with internal > functions, there will be no need for CHANGELOG entries or version > number changes when incorporating them. As a result, I would be okay > with starting the release cycle for 4.0 before finishing those > changes.
I think there are still too much work in progress to have a beta now... maybe alpha would be more relevant. The biggest remaining issue is #59, I don't think it can be addressed in just a few days... Thank you, -- Elie _______________________________________________ Gregorio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-devel
